Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9073503
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T18:25:59+00:00 2026-06-16T18:25:59+00:00

I found interesting thing while working with reflection. I tried to retrieve constructors of

  • 0

I found interesting thing while working with reflection. I tried to retrieve constructors of simple class and their modifiers.

public class Test {
    public Test(Object... args) {}
}

Here is the code to retrieve constructor modifiers:

Class<?> clazz = Test.class;
Constructor<?>[] ctors = clazz.getDeclaredConstructors();
for (Constructor<?> ctor : ctors) {        
    int mod = ctor.getModifiers();
    /*if not package-private modifier*/
    if(mod!=0) {
        System.out.println( Modifier.toString(mod)));
    }
}

The result is:

    public transient  

If I pass to constructor not variable parameters, but just array, it’s ok.

public class Test {
    public Test(Object[] args) {}
}

The result is:

    public  

The same happens regardless of constructor modifier (public, protected, private) or parameters type (primitive or reference). How could it be, whereas “transient” is not valid modifier for constructor?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T18:26:00+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 6:26 pm

    Access modifiers are encoded as bit masks inside the class file. The JVM spec assigns different meaning to some of the bits depending on whether they appear in a method modifier or a field modifier. Bit 7 (0x0080) is one such bit.

    For methods:

    ACC_VARARGS    0x0080  Declared with variable number of arguments.
    

    For fields:

    ACC_TRANSIENT  0x0080  Declared transient; not written or read by a persistent
                           object manager.
    

    Since you’re looking at a method, the correct interpretation of this modifier is ACC_VARARGS and not ACC_TRANSIENT.

    However, the Modifier class only appears capable of dealing with a subset of modifiers defined in the JVM spec. Because all it takes is an int, it’s unable to tell ACC_VARARGS and ACC_TRANSIENT apart.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Found interesting thing while compile the following piece of code: 1 class A {
Making a migration from 2.8.1 to 2.9.1 found interesting thing. Tried to write this
I found a very interesting/strange thing about MAX() function in SQL. I have column
I found an interesting thing. I've setup Nginx for Base Auth with htpasswd file.
I found this interesting thing when I was trying out the new feature optional
I have found few interesting things (for me at least) while generating random integers
I recently found some interesting macro while browsing random sources around the internet: #define
Found interesting thing in Python (2.7) that never mentioned before. This: a = []
Found an interesting thing about ArrayList, ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(); list.add(0, 0-element); list.add(1,
I checked the code example at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd728281.aspx#Y0 , and found one interesting thing: if

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.