Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6352833
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T22:17:59+00:00 2026-05-24T22:17:59+00:00

I found myself writing this just a bit ago: template <long int T_begin, long

  • 0

I found myself writing this just a bit ago:

template <long int T_begin, long int T_end>
class range_class {
 public:
   class iterator {
      friend class range_class;
    public:
      long int operator *() const { return i_; }
      const iterator &operator ++() { ++i_; return *this; }
      iterator operator ++(int) { iterator copy(*this); ++i_; return copy; }

      bool operator ==(const iterator &other) const { return i_ == other.i_; }
      bool operator !=(const iterator &other) const { return i_ != other.i_; }

    protected:
      iterator(long int start) : i_ (start) { }

    private:
      unsigned long i_;
   };

   iterator begin() const { return iterator(T_begin); }
   iterator end() const { return iterator(T_end); }
};

template <long int T_begin, long int T_end>
const range_class<T_begin, T_end>
range()
{
   return range_class<T_begin, T_end>();
}

And this allows me to write things like this:

for (auto i: range<0, 10>()) {
    // stuff with i
}

Now, I know what I wrote is maybe not the best code. And maybe there’s a way to make it more flexible and useful. But it seems to me like something like this should’ve been made part of the standard.

So is it? Was some sort of new library added for iterators over a range of integers, or maybe a generic range of computed scalar values?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T22:18:01+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 10:18 pm

    The C++ standard library does not have one, but Boost.Range has boost::counting_range, which certainly qualifies. You could also use boost::irange, which is a bit more focused in scope.

    C++20’s range library will allow you to do this via view::iota(start, end).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I found myself keep writing pretty long one-liner code(influenced by shell pipe), like this:
I just found myself writing a piece of code that looks like this: def
Yesterday, I found myself writing code like this: SomeStruct getSomeStruct() { SomeStruct input; cin
I found myself writing the following a lot: int location =2; vector<int> vec; vector<int>::iterator
I've found myself writing for(int i=0;i<myvec.size();i++) myvec[i]->DoWhatever(param); a lot, and I'd like to compress
I just found myself creating a class called InstructionBuilderFactoryMapFactory. That's 4 pattern suffixes on
In my javascript objects i found myself writing this: this_object = this; It seems
I find myself writing this class often in my python code when I need
I'm just in the middle of some Perl code and I found myself writing
I recently found myself writing a piece of code that executed a Core Data

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.