Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8877047
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T19:22:23+00:00 2026-06-14T19:22:23+00:00

I found the following implementation in a code base I am going through Interface

  • 0

I found the following implementation in a code base I am going through

Interface IOrder
{
GetSubmittedOrder();
CreateOrder();
GetExistingOrder();
}

Class Order : IOrder
{
BuildSpecialOrder();
AddSpecialOrderParameters();
IOrder.GetSubmittedOrder();
IOrder.CreateOrder();
IOrder.GetExistingOrder();
}

Now, when we want to access the last three methods from this Order object, we need to do the following declaration

IOrder objOrder = new Order();

What is the reason(advantages) for creating an implementation like this? Does this practice have a specific name?

Note: Please let me know if this is a better fit at programmers.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T19:22:24+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 7:22 pm

    I would say that that’s the incorrect usage of explicit interface implementation. It basically means that the methods are not visible in the public class contract. That’s why you have to cast the object to the interface type first (you are using an implicit cast). You could also have done:

    var order = (IOrder)order;
    order.GetExistingOrder();
    

    It’s normally used when the class method collides with an interface method or when a class implements two interfaces with the same method (but different purposes).

    It should be used with care since it can indicate that your class have a too large responsibility (and should be divided into smaller classes).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In Cocoa Fundametals I found following code: @interface ValidatingArray : NSMutableArray { NSMutableArray *embeddedArray;
Reading through documentation, I found following: 1.9.1 1.8.4 1.8.2 A version of 1.8.2 select
I found the following piece of code from the adw launcher: Object service =
I found the following code somewhere, but I am not understanding the code properly.
I found the following code in my team's project: Public Shared Function isRemoteDisconnectMessage(ByRef m
I am using the following code in my controller implementation file to create the
I'd need an Erlang implementation of the OpenId protocol. I found the following, but
I have a base class with the following (trimmed for brevity) declaration: public abstract
I've found that the following code doesn't compile in Visual Studio 2010 (but works
I've found the following code online, int binary_search(int a[], int low, int high, int

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.