Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6837017
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:25:33+00:00 2026-05-26T23:25:33+00:00

I found the following snippet (I think in Wikipedia) that creates a different run-time

  • 0

I found the following snippet (I think in Wikipedia) that creates a different run-time when C++ comments are recognized than when not:

int a = 4 //* This is a comment, but where does it end? */ 2
  ;

But until now that’s been the only one (variants excluded).

I’m not interested in differentiating using __STDC__ and the like, and not in programs that C89 will not compile.

Are there other programs/snippets producing a different run-time with C89 than C99?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:25:33+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:25 pm

    This program will print 0.000000 on a conforming C89 implementation and 1.000000 on a conforming C99 implementation:

    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    
    int main()
    {
        double d = strtod("0x1", NULL);
        printf("%f\n", d);
        return 0;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Found the following snippet on the Closure page on wikipedia //# Return a list
In this tutorial I've found the following snippet: deposit :: (Num a) => a
I found a script which has the following snippet:- userid=`expr \`id\` : .*uid=[0-9]*(\(.[0-9a-z]*\)) .*`
I found the following code somewhere, but I am not understanding the code properly.
In a response elsewhere, I found the following snippet: In general it is nicer
What kind of type inference does Typed Racket do? I found the following snippet
I found the following snippet of code and am trying to create an ISAPI
All I have found about this is that there are inconsistencies among different web
I have the following snippet of code and I'm trying to run it from
I have the following snippet below from my script that's using a WebRequest to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.