Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 668001
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T23:59:30+00:00 2026-05-13T23:59:30+00:00

I got a function like def f(): … … return [list1, list2] this returns

  • 0

I got a function like

def f():
    ...
    ...
    return [list1, list2]

this returns a list of lists

[[list1.item1,list1.item2,...],[list2.item1,list2.item2,...]]

now when I do the following:

for i in range(0,2):print f()[i][0:10]

it works and print the lists sliced

but if i do

print f()[0:2][0:10]

then it prints the lists ignoring the [0:10] slicing.

Is there any way to make the second form work or do I have to loop every time to get the desired result?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T23:59:30+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:59 pm

    The reason why these two behave differently is because f()[0:2][0:10] works like this:

    1. f() gives you a list of lists.
    2. [0:2] gives you a list containing the first two elements in the list of lists. Since the elements in the list of lists are lists, this is also a list of lists.
    3. [0:10] gives you a list containing the first ten elements in the list of lists that was produced in step 2.

    In other words, f()[0:2][0:10] starts with a list of lists, then takes a sublist of that list of lists (which is also a list of lists), and then takes a sublist of the second list of lists (which is also a list of lists).

    In contrast, f()[i] actually extracts the i-th element out of your list of lists, which is just a simple list (not a list of lists). Then, when you apply [0:10], you are applying it to the simple list that you got from f()[i] and not to a list of lists.

    The bottom line is that any solution that gives the desired behavior will have to access a single array element like [i] at some point, rather than working only with slices like [i:j].

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 409k
  • Answers 409k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer What you want is a "quoted CSV file". That is… May 15, 2026 at 7:09 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The answer was to process the links to start with… May 15, 2026 at 7:09 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer ActiveSupport is more separate now in Rails 3. If you… May 15, 2026 at 7:09 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.