Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8148927
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T14:44:33+00:00 2026-06-06T14:44:33+00:00

I got a table with over 6.6 millions rows. I got a field, named

  • 0

I got a table with over 6.6 millions rows.

I got a field, named trip_id who’s in BINARY(16). I find my query too slow (0.2 seconds). This query run near once every 3 seconds.

Before doing anything stupid, I want to know if I lower the index size on trip_id from full to 12, would it make a difference ?

If I try to tweak my query more, would it make a difference ?

Thanks

EDIT:

Query :

SELECT      stop_times.stop_id
FROM        trips
LEFT JOIN   stop_times ON trips.trip_id = stop_times.trip_id
WHERE       trips.route_id  = '141'
GROUP BY    stop_times.stop_id
ORDER BY    trips.trip_headsign ASC,
            stop_times.stop_sequence ASC

trip_id BINARY(16)

route_id SMALLINT(3)

trip_headsign VARCHAR(50)

stop_sequence SMALLINT(3)

Explain of the query :
Explain of the query

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T14:44:34+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 2:44 pm

    After doing researches, I’ve found the problem because yes, 0.2 seconds is slow.

    SELECT      t.trip_headsign, st.stop_sequence, s.stop_code, s.stop_name
    FROM        stop_times AS st
    JOIN        stops AS s USING (stop_id)
    JOIN        (   SELECT  trip_id,
                            route_id,
                            trip_headsign
                    FROM    trips
                    WHERE   route_id = '141'
                    LIMIT   2
                ) AS t
    WHERE       t.trip_id = st.trip_id
    GROUP BY    st.stop_id
    

    First, instead of doing a LEFT JOIN, JOIN is faster here. But the important point, I was matching all results from trips in the WHERE statement.

    However, since a bus can only have 2 directions, I only have to limit my results to 2. Now, my results are near 0.018. Over 1000% improvement.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've got a very large SQLite table with over 500,000 rows with about 15
I have got an over 500 rows table with a column called ID which
I've got a table of temperature samples over time from several sources and I
Confusing title...my apologies. What I've got is a table with two related rows. I
I've got a table defined over a composite type: create type footype as (
I've got a table of values telling me how the signal level changes over
I've got table with two columns: name and grade. It looks sth like this:
Got this: Table a ID RelatedBs 1 NULL 2 NULL Table b AID ID
got a table with dates and prices. Date Price 2012-01-01 25 2012-01-05 12 2012-01-10
I got a table in my HTML and I want to generate new temporary

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.