Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3423400
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T06:21:01+00:00 2026-05-18T06:21:01+00:00

I got a WCF service, and one of the return objects is: [DataContract] sealed

  • 0

I got a WCF service, and one of the return objects is:

[DataContract]
sealed class Class1
{
    [DataMember]
    public int Prop1 { get; private set; }
    ...
}

Incidentially, one of the properties, let’s say it’s this Prop1, I only set within the service, and then read in the client.

This, however, produces CA1811: Avoid uncalled private code on the .get() of Prop1.

Am I doing something wrong, or should I ignore this warning, or should I do something differently?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T06:21:02+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 6:21 am

    You are not really doing anything wrong. The warning is raised because the getter is never called on the service side; which is where the analyzed code resides. I think you can safely ignore the warning

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have to get the maximum throughput performance in my WCF service. In one
Having successfully got a WCF service and client to talk to one another using
I've got a WCF service on a server on one side of a firewall.
I've got WCF service which contains List with data from LibW.dll(my dll). In main
I've got a WCF service which handles some sensitive data. I'd like to make
I've got a WCF service up and running on a server. We have a
I've got a WCF service with lots of method and DataContracts. It is usually
I've got a WCF service that offers a Login method. A client is required
I've got a WCF service which swallows up exceptions thrown in called methods and
So I've finally got my WCF service setup and talking to browser via ASP.NET

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.