Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3633062
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T00:36:18+00:00 2026-05-19T00:36:18+00:00

I guess there is a good reason, but I don’t understand why sometimes we

  • 0

I guess there is a good reason, but I don’t understand why sometimes we put for example 5 instances having the same webapplications on the same physical server.

Has it something to do with an optimisation for a multi processor architecture?
The max allowed ram limit for JVM or something else?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T00:36:19+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 12:36 am

    Hmmm… After a long time I am seeing this question again 🙂

    Well a multiple JVM instances on a single machine solves a lot of issues. First of let us face this: Although JDK 1.7 is coming into picture, a lot of legacy application were developed using JDK 1.3 or 1.4 or 1.5. And still a major chunk of JDK is divided among them.

    Now to your question:

    Historically, there are three primary issues that system architects have addressed by deploying multiple JVMs on a single box:

    1. Garbage collection inefficiencies: As heap sizes grow, garbage collection cycles–especially for major collections–tended to introduce significant delays into processing, thanks to the single-threaded GC. Multiple JVMs combat this by allowing smaller heap sizes in general and enabling some measure of concurrency during GC cycles (e.g., with four nodes, when one goes into GC, you still have three others actively processing).

    2. Resource utilization: Older JVMs were unable to scale efficiently past four CPUs or so. The answer? Run a separate JVM for every 2 CPUs in the box (mileage may vary depending on the application, of course).

    3. 64-bit issues: Older JVMs were unable to allocate heap sizes beyond the 32-bit maximum. Again, multiple JVMs allow you to maximize your resource utilization.

    4. Availability: One final reason that people sometimes run multiple JVMs on a single box is for availability. While it’s true that this practice doesn’t address hardware failures, it does address a failure in a single instance of an application server.

    Taken from ( http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20044 )

    I have mostly seen weblogic. Here is a link for further reading:

    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13222_01/wls/docs92/perform/WLSTuning.html#wp1104298

    Hope this will help you.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a good scala-esque (I guess I mean functional) way of recursively listing
I guess there will be a very simple answer to this. But here goes.
I guess there might be some overlapping with previous SO questions, but I could
I've written an example of my problem, for some reason (which I don't seem
I understand the reason for having the HTML helpers in ASP.NET MVC and extending
I guess there must be an auto reindex every time a delete takes place.
Here's the main question I guess : Is there a .NET way to get
Is there any ways to try to guess encryption algorithm used to encrypt the
Are there any open source (or I guess commercial) packages that you can plug
I guess another way to phrase this would be Is there a class like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.