Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7774433
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T17:22:41+00:00 2026-06-01T17:22:41+00:00

I had a method like this that its consumers are calling it: static public

  • 0

I had a method like this that its consumers are calling it:

static public void DisplayOrderComments(param1, param2, param3, param4)

Now I added an overload for it like this:

static public void DisplayOrderComments(param1, param2, param3, param4, param5)
{
    DisplayOrderComments(param1, param2, param3, param4);
    param5.Foo();
}

Is it a bad practice? Are there better ways of doing it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T17:22:42+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 5:22 pm

    This is absolutely fine – it keeps code DRY and avoids unnecessary duplication.

    Not only is it not a bad practice, it is a good practice.


    If you are using C# 4.0 and above (VS 2010+), you can use an optional argument for your param5 instead of overloading, as Mikey Mouse mentions in this answer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I had a method with a lot of persistence calls that used a nHibernate
Initially I had a method in our DL that would take in the object
I was working on some code recently and came across a method that had
Had a problem with the recursive conflictCheck() method. That seems fine now. I have
Ive had a similar question as this one before, and when that solved this
Alright I have an xml document that looks something like this: <xml> <list> <partner>
I had a need for a method that could take a collection of strings,
I got a problem today. It had a method and I need to find
we had a heated discussion about a method name. We have a class User
I've had problems with the update method in subsonic, so instead of using: a.Update()

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.