Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6837795
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:31:11+00:00 2026-05-26T23:31:11+00:00

I had good luck finding a way to achieve intersect() faster on stack overflow

  • 0

I had good luck finding a way to achieve intersect() faster on stack overflow with a pre-sorted 1d vector, so I am hoping for the same luck for unique() 😉

Almost 1/4’th of my runtime is spent using unique(). I would like to speed this up, and I can assume it to be 1d pre-sorted vector. Is there any other low-level functions I can use directly to speed this up?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:31:12+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:31 pm

    You can simply use diff to check whether consecutive elements are the same.

    vector = [1 2 3 4 4 5];
    
    uniqueVector = vector([true;diff(vector(:))>0])
    
    uniqueVector =
         1     2     3     4     5
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have not had much luck hunting for finding a good explanation of what
So I tried searching SO hoping someone had a good explanation of this, with
I had good luck with cached offline apps until I tried including data from
I've done a good amount of research here on Stack Overflow and I've tried
I know this isn't a unique issue but I've not had much luck finding
Had a good search here but can't see anything that gets my mind in
I’ve had a good look and can’t seem to find out how to select
I've had a good look around and am certain that there's no matching question
What memory leak detectors have people had a good experience with? Here is a
I was wondering if anyone had some good general information on windows terminal services

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.