Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8959163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T15:22:54+00:00 2026-06-15T15:22:54+00:00

I hate this situation (MACOSX) $ perl -MSocket -le ‘print SOMAXCONN’ 128 How can

  • 0

I hate this situation (MACOSX)

$ perl -MSocket -le 'print SOMAXCONN'
128

How can I deal with more than 128 sockets? I’m using IO::Socket::INET (multiplexing with IO::Select at this time) but I have this limitation.

I was thinking in pre-fork N process (each dealing with 128 using select or poll) but I don’t know if it can work. Some Ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T15:22:55+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 3:22 pm

    This is a configurable limitation at the OS X kernel level. Fortunately its pretty easy to fix, but only if you have root. Here’s an article explaining how to tweak the kernel configuration. The relevant entry is kern.ipc.somaxconn.

    Otherwise you can try using threads, not sure if each thread gets its own allocation of sockets, or any number of pre-forking servers on CPAN.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I really hate this error, because it can be so hard to pin point.
I hate to post this but I am on a time crunch and need
I hate to be the third person to ask this, but the previous two
I hate to ask such a general question, and this is not a write
I don't see how this is possible, but I really, really hate to run
If there was ever a time to hate IE, this is it. This code
I hate blocks. They are meant to make the code more concise, but I
I can't believe I am having this problem. I've been looking and looking but
I hate posting this since it's somewhat subjective, but it feels like there's a
I hate to ask this, but I'm in a time crunch and I'm hoping

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.