Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9129063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T07:39:41+00:00 2026-06-17T07:39:41+00:00

i have 2 different classes. One is a generic valueHolder, that can contain anything

  • 0

i have 2 different classes. One is a generic valueHolder, that can contain anything that extends number.

class ValueHolder<T extends number>{
    private T currentValue;

   //more functions, database logic, etc...
}

the other class is more complex, and has a “targetValue”. Also its parameterized like this:

class MoreComplexClass<T extends ValueHolder<?>>
    private T valueHolder;
    private XXX requiredValue;

    //a lot more functions.
}

Is it “possible” to use the Type of the valueHolder for the requiredValue of the MoreComplexClass?
What i am trying to achieve is: Beeing able to compare currentValue and requiredValue with > == < Operators without casting and without loosing Typesafety. (Maybe i’m also thinking way to complex to achiee this)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T07:39:42+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 7:39 am

    the answer is YES, you can declare the complex class this way:

    class MoreComplexClass<N extends Number, T extends ValueHolder<N>>
        private T valueHolder;
        private N requiredValue;
    
        //a lot more functions.
    }
    

    but since you are using the Number class, you won’t be able to use those operators, you’ll need to use one of the XXXvalue() methods (i.e.: doubleValue(), longValue()) from the Number class to able to use those operators.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have 3 different classes, a generic entity class, and then two classes that
I have a few different classes which origin is a another class. I have
I have a need for two slightly different classes, that have the same members,
I have a page/gsp that displays 3 different classes. This means that I need
I have classes that are named exactly the same across different plug-ins that I
I have two classes that represent two different database entities. Their relationship is 1:m
I have multiple classes that will store similar data for different uses and I
I have the following class structure: public abstract class Generic<T extends SuperClass> public class
I'm writing a couple of classes that all have generic type arguments, but I
I have a database that can have different types of relatinships based upon what

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.