Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 737829
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T07:46:00+00:00 2026-05-14T07:46:00+00:00

I have 2 machines running same workers. One machine shoud be primary as it

  • 0

I have 2 machines running same workers. One machine shoud be “primary” as it is very powerful, and the other machine should server as a backup for when primary machine goes down or crashes. When primary machine is up and running, all jobs should default to the primary machine for as long as there are available workers.

From my tests, I’ve noticed that gearmanD randomly picks a machine to send the job to. Is there any way at all to prioritize the machines to send jobs to?

Example:

Primary machine running 8 instasnces of the same worker
Backup machine running 1 instance

Do:
Use primary machine until it no more available workers are there to fullfill the job queue, then continue onto backup machine.

Any way of accomplishing this?

Thanks everyone!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T07:46:01+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:46 am

    I don’t think this is possible with the current API. You could run 2 gearmand’s though, one on each of your worker servers and set them both in the client, the powerful machine’s first. This way, at least current versions of the client APIs I’m aware of, will first use the first gearmand and its workers and if that isn’t available, it will switch to the second, which has the less powerful machine’s workers…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.