Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8984051
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T20:59:40+00:00 2026-06-15T20:59:40+00:00

I have 2 myISAM tables, called ‘tests’ and ‘completed_tests’, one with 170 entries and

  • 0

I have 2 myISAM tables, called ‘tests’ and ‘completed_tests’, one with 170 entries and the other with 118k entries. When I run this query:

SELECT ct.archive, ct.status, ct.score, ct.users_LOGIN, t.lessons_ID, t.content_ID, t.keep_best 
 FROM completed_tests ct,tests t 
WHERE ct.status != 'deleted' and ct.status != 'incomplete' and t.id=ct.tests_ID and t.lessons_ID=10;

Then it takes around 30 second to accomplish. Subsequent calls to the same query, or related queries (different lessons_ID for example), are much faster. They remain faster even if I reset the query cache or restart the mysql server. I suppose this means that the tables are cached into memory (and stay there).
My problem is that this specific query seems to be causing problems on high traffic sites that run this application (I guess because the server is slow on memory and emptying its cache?).
My questions are:

  • Is there a way to consistently replicate the 30” delay on my system, so I can try optimizing the query? Should I, for example, empty my system’s cache?
  • Is there a way to optimize the query above? Running a explain gives:

Running explain gives:

mysql> explain SELECT ct.archive, ct.status, ct.score, ct.users_LOGIN, t.lessons_ID, t.content_ID, t.keep_best FROM completed_tests ct,tests t WHERE ct.status != 'deleted' and ct.status != 'incomplete' and t.id=ct.tests_ID and t.lessons_ID=10;
+----+-------------+-------+------+-----------------+----------+---------+---------------+------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys   | key      | key_len | ref           | rows | Extra       |
+----+-------------+-------+------+-----------------+----------+---------+---------------+------+-------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | t     | ref  | PRIMARY,idx1    | idx1     | 3       | const         |    4 |             |
|  1 | SIMPLE      | ct    | ref  | tests_ID,status | tests_ID | 3       | firstcho.t.id | 1025 | Using where |
+----+-------------+-------+------+-----------------+----------+---------+---------------+------+-------------+

Which, to my understanding, indicates that indexing is used successfully.
Thanks to all.

Table structure

>show create table 'tests';
CREATE TABLE `tests` (
  `id` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `active` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1',
  `content_ID` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `lessons_ID` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `name` varchar(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `mastery_score` tinyint(4) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `description` text,
  `options` text,
  `publish` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '1',
  `keep_best` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '0',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `idx1` (`lessons_ID`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=171 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8

>show create table completed_tests;
CREATE TABLE `completed_tests` (
  `id` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `users_LOGIN` varchar(100) DEFAULT NULL,
  `tests_ID` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `test` longblob,
  `status` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL,
  `timestamp` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `archive` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `time_start` int(10) unsigned DEFAULT NULL,
  `time_end` int(10) unsigned DEFAULT NULL,
  `time_spent` int(10) unsigned DEFAULT NULL,
  `score` float DEFAULT NULL,
  `pending` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `users_login` (`users_LOGIN`),
  KEY `tests_ID` (`tests_ID`),
  KEY `status` (`status`),
  KEY `timestamp` (`timestamp`),
  KEY `archive` (`archive`),
  KEY `score` (`score`),
  KEY `pending` (`pending`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=117996 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T20:59:41+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 8:59 pm

    Finally I resorted to splitting the table to 2, moving the blob object to the second table and joining wherever needed. Unfortunately that involved changing many lines of code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a standard one directional master-slave setup. The tables have MyIsam storage engine.
I have a database called av2web, which contains 130 MyISAM tables and 20 innodb
I have a couple of tables that are related to each other. engine: myisam
I have a 5GB database, all tables are MyISAM. It runs into heavy load
Say you have a MySQL 5.0 MyISAM table with 100 million rows, with one
I have table with 300 000 records (MyISAM). I get record from this table
I just changed from Access to mySQL. I have a few tables, called Veranstaltung
I have two tables (MYISAM) create table A (email varchar(50)); create table B( email
I have two MySQL (MyISAM) tables: Posts: PostID(primary key), post_text, post_date, etc. Comments: CommentID(primary
I have two MySQL (MyIsAm) tables that represent letting units and bookings: LettingUnits (

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.