Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7430617
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T09:10:15+00:00 2026-05-29T09:10:15+00:00

I have 2 nested discriminated unions: type ServiceTypes = | Contexts | Context of

  • 0

I have 2 nested discriminated unions:

type ServiceTypes =
    | Contexts
    | Context of int
    | Producers

type ServiceActions =
    | Get of ServiceTypes
    | Update of ServiceTypes

And a nested match statement:

let s_action = match action with
               | Get(stype) -> sprintf "Get%s" (match stype with
                                                | Contexts -> sprintf "Contexts"
                                                | Context(id)  -> (sprintf "Context/%d" id))
                                                | _ -> raise (RequestException("get"))
               | Update(stype) -> sprintf "Update%s" (match stype with
                                                      | Producers -> (sprintf "Producers")
                                                      | _ -> raise (RequestException("update")))

The goal is to build a request string with a call looking like that req.Send(Update Producers).

Anyway for a reason that I do not understand, the compiler gives me 2 warnings:

  1. on the Update(stype) I get a This rule will never be matched
  2. on the the first match stype I get a Incomplete pattern matches on this expression. For example, the value ‘Producers’ may indicate a case not covered by the pattern(s).

So the question is why do I get these 2 warnings? Did I miss something on the way matching works?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T09:10:16+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 9:10 am

    Your closing parenthesis is in the wrong place.

    | Context(id)  -> (sprintf "Context/%d" id))
    | _ -> raise (RequestException("get"))
    

    should be

    | Context(id)  -> (sprintf "Context/%d" id)
    | _ -> raise (RequestException("get")))
    

    Indeed, for the sake of clarity I would get rid of all extraneous parentheses (which in this case is actually every parenthesis):

    let s_action =
        match action with
        | Get stype    -> match stype with
                            | Contexts   -> "Contexts"
                            | Context id -> sprintf "Context/%d" id
                            | _          -> RequestException "get" |> raise
                          |> sprintf "Get%s"
        | Update stype -> match stype with
                            | Producers -> "Producers"
                            | _         -> RequestException "update" |> raise
                          |> sprintf "Update%s"
    

    Personally I find this more readable, but of course that’s subjective so YMMV.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have nested iterator in my custom stack template class. The problem I get
I have nested containers std::map<int, std::map<T, U> > and want to populate them properly,
I have nested table xxx_nested_table in Oracle CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE xxx_tab AS TABLE
I have nested dictionaries: {'key0': {'attrs': {'entity': 'p', 'hash': '34nj3h43b4n3', 'id': '4130'}, u'key1': {'attrs':
I have nested xsl:for loops: <xsl:for-each select=/Root/A> <xsl:for-each select=/Root/B> <!-- Code --> </xsl:for> </xsl:for>
What if I have nested loops, and I want to break out of all
Is it possible to have nested set capabilities in this somewhat custom setup? Consider
I keep finding that if I have nested divs inside each other, and one
I have a number of tables, which have nested tables. I using jQuery to
as per the title; is it possible to have nested comments in valid HTML?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.