Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5927891
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T14:13:52+00:00 2026-05-22T14:13:52+00:00

I have 64-bit Debian Squeeze systems that run an older 32-bit version of SGE

  • 0

I have 64-bit Debian Squeeze systems that run an older 32-bit version of SGE execd. When I run uname -m at the command line, I get what I’d expect: x86_64. But when I run uname -m inside an SGE script on the same host, the output is i686. This breaks anything which depends on a correct reading from uname -m.

I can workaround the problem, so my question is more academic than practical. I downloaded the uname source code but I couldn’t find where it was pulling machine architecture data from. I assume this problem comes about because uname -m is run by a 32-bit parent process instead of a 64-bit parent process. So my question is – is that assumption correct, and if so, why is uname influenced by the architecture of the process which executes it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T14:13:52+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 2:13 pm

    uname -m is used to report the personality(2) of the ‘virtual machine’ running the code. Because the kernel can run code with different personalities (say, 32-bit code on a 64-bit machine, complete with ‘only’ a 32-bit address space, or short inodes, different signal numbers, or similar constraints), programs might use the output of uname -m to determine how they should run — i.e., which kernel interfaces they will get at runtime.

    So it is important that uname -m reflect the personality, not the full extent of the hardware.

    Perhaps you can insert a call to setarch(8) or personality(2) into your software before the fork(2) exec() of your uname -m command and subsequent helper programs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

i have bit of code that causes an underflow: var t1, t2, delta: DWORD:
I have a bit of code that fits theoretical prediction to experimental data, and
I have a bit of a problem that I can't seem to code my
I have a bit of a strange problem. I have a music app that
I have a bit of a monster update query that I can't quite fit
I have a few columns in my database schema that have bit data types
I have a bit of a question that has been bothering me for a
I have a bit of script that I think is nearly there. I have
I was install Roundup 1.4 by Debian Squeeze official repo and want to run
I have Apache running on a public-facing Debian server, and am a bit worried

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.