Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3283020
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T19:59:37+00:00 2026-05-17T19:59:37+00:00

I have a 64 bit server, 8 GB RAM, dual quad CPU. No resources

  • 0

I have a 64 bit server, 8 GB RAM, dual quad CPU. No resources are ever hitting 100% (except, I guess, the JVM — right?).

I need to index several million records for Solr, but the machine is in production. I recognize having a second machine for indexing would be helpful.

Should I dedicate a second instance of the JVM, dedicated to Solr?

Right now, when I run an index, pages which are normally served in 200 milliseconds will serve up in about 1.5 seconds, sometimes more… hitting, even, the dreaded “Service is Unavailable” error.

I adjusted my JVM Heap as follows:

-Xmx1024m
-XX:MaxPermSize256m

In case I’m chasing the wrong solution, allow me to broaden the landscape a bit. It seems that I can’t affect the indexing speed of Solr. I had previously been indexing about 150,000 records per hour on a dev server virtualized on a workstation. In a production environment with much more hardware available, I’m indexing at the exact same speed.

Without data to prove it, I think that my JVM adjustments did not speed up the indexing, although it may have allowed the CF server to continue serving pages. I must say, the indexing speed is terribly slow, but I do know that it’s not a function of the data access layer. I rewrote it from pure ORM to objects backed by SQL Stored Procedures thinking that was the slowdown (no effect).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T19:59:37+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 7:59 pm

    use a separate instance for indexing the index, the only trick is getting the running searching instance to re-read the updated index, in which case, you set up a master (the indexer) and slave(the searcher) and do replication. this will both make the searcher not get interrupted, and the indexer will utilize its own JVM including its own share of the resources.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have IIS6 running on a 64-bit Windows 2003 server with 32Gb physical RAM.
I have an application that is currently running against a 32-bit SQL Server 2005
I have done a bit of testing on this myself (During the server side
I have an SQL Server DB with a table with these fields: A bit
Unfortunately I have to use Windows Server 2003 on my 32 bit workstation due
I have Apache running on a public-facing Debian server, and am a bit worried
We are having some issues with our production SQL Server. Server: Dual Quad Core
Environment: Windows 2003 Server (32 bit); IIS6, ASP.NET 2.0 (3.5); 4Gb Ram; 1 Worker
I have this bit of javascript written with jQuery 1.2.5. It's contained inside the
I have a bit of code that basically reads an XML document using the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.