Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 643947
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T21:20:17+00:00 2026-05-13T21:20:17+00:00

I have a BeanDefinitionDecorator that makes modifications to properties that a user would set

  • 0

I have a BeanDefinitionDecorator that makes modifications to properties that a user would set on a bean. It works fine; except if the bean is using placeholders. I am trying to find a strategy to modify those values while still have access to the original value at runtime. An example of what this would look like in XML:

<bean id="bean">
    <property name="jdbcUrl" value="${jdbc.url}" />
    <d:spyDecorator />
</bean>

I know that user would be writing the jdbcUrl property as “jdbc:myDatabase”. What I want to do is change their property to “jdbc:spy:myDatabase”. This is easy if they are just using string literals for the property value, but if they are using property placeholders I am not sure how to change the value — because I need the original value in order to supply the new value. They key is to keep the property rewriting transparent to the user.

Are there any possible solutions for this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T21:20:17+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:20 pm

    I think your namespace handler can register a BeanFactoryPostProcessor (implementing Orderer with order = Integer.MAX_VALUE to be the last post processor applied). Then your BeanDefinitionDecorator will register the beans being decorated for processing with that post processor (implement it in the post processor somehow), and post processor will apply the actual property modification to that beans.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Have a fun issue with sharepoint calendar view filtering. That code works fine: SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
Have a (rather complex) app that works fine on iOS 4 but fails on
Have two separate databases. The master that holds the user information(username, password, address etc.).
Have a SomeLib.pro file that contains: CONFIG += debug TEMPLATE = lib TARGET =
Have a matrix report now that has Position, Hours and Wages for a location
Have a bunch of WCF REST services hosted on Azure that access a SQL
Have some code: using (var ctx = new testDataContext()) { var options = new
Have a look at one of my websites: moskah.com The problem is that it
Have posting working wonderfully, and reading the response happily EXCEPT when one of the
Have a simple contact us XPage created. Have server side validation in place that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.