Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 497547
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T05:47:31+00:00 2026-05-13T05:47:31+00:00

I have a build process that creates an ear in a fairly complicated manner

  • 0

I have a build process that creates an ear in a fairly complicated manner (multiple EJB jars, a couple of wars, a couple of sars (which are JBoss specific). The ant process for piecing this together is somewhat complex.

What is the best strategy to not recreate the creation logic of the ejb creation in ANT but still be able to deploy exploded to the application server or in an ear for QA and production.

Although I’m concerned about JBoss, the question is really relevant to any application server that supports exploded ear deployment, and is really more about ANT, how to avoid two different targets that recreated the logic of creating a zip file vs copying to a directory.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T05:47:31+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:47 am

    I’ve found that what works best for us, is to create the ZIP/EAR/WAR/JAR contents in exploded form in the file system, and then as the final step zip/ear/war/jar it up to a file.

    This allows us to have post processing steps which only knows of files and not zip-file entries, which is usually much simpler. If you work with an exploded deployment and a server which picks up changed files in the exploded deployment, you can simply use rsync to update only those files actually changed in the server deployment.

    You would then have the building in one target, and packing in another, making it easy to do both.


    See Alexander Pogrebnyak‘s answer in regards to how to handle manifests using this solution.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have part of a build process that creates a hideously long paths in
I have a build process that does the following: Runs TLBIMP on a number
I have a custom script step in my build process that zips the executable.
I have a complex build process to generate a couple of python extension modules
I have a project which as part of the build process creates an XMLBeans
We have what I think is a fairly standard build process: 1. Developer: Check
Background I have a few scripts that run as part of my build process
i build a website in vb.net ... i have a table process that have
I have an automated build process that I'd like to extend so I can
The Problem: In have a process that builds our executable. Before running the build

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.