Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3278536
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T19:29:31+00:00 2026-05-17T19:29:31+00:00

I have a bunch of insert, update, and delete operations I need to execute

  • 0

I have a bunch of insert, update, and delete operations I need to execute via Ajax. Which of the following would be a better approach?

  1. Individual methods for each function (e.g. delete_foo, insert_foo, update_foo, delete_bar, insert_bar, update_bar, etc.)

  2. A “master” method and just pass a parameter to distinguish between operations.

A benefit of #2’s approach would be that common things in the individual methods, such as validation or id decryption, etc. could be consolidated. However, it would also mean this master method would fairly large.

Having a master method call the individual method wouldn’t be such a great idea, I think. The reason is that the individual methods, if stripped of the common tasks now handled by the master method, are one-liner codes (for the most part).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T19:29:32+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 7:29 pm

    An alternative to both of these methods is to use the REST rules. This makes use of the other HTTP Methods other than GET and POST.

    For example

    GET /foo            --select foo
    POST /foo           --this would insert
    PUT /foo            --this would update
    DELETE /foo         --this would delete
    
    GET /bar            --select bar
    POST /bar           --this would insert
    PUT /bar            --this would update
    DELETE /bar         --this would delete
    

    More details can be found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_State_Transfer#RESTful_web_services.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a tsql code ,which is basically bunch of insert and update statements
We have bunch of Domain Entities which should be rendered to an html format,
I have a bunch of named value parameters in a Dictionary<string, object> , which
I have a bunch of generic code that is used a lot, which i'd
I have a bunch of assignment operations in Visual Studio, and I want to
I have a bunch of old posts on a blog that I would like
If I have an insert statement with a bunch of values where the first
I have a SQL script that inserts data (via INSERT statements currently numbering in
I have a bunch (in thousands against different tables) of auto generated INSERT statements.
Basically I need to insert a bunch of data to an Excel file. Creating

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.