Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 225373
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:24:25+00:00 2026-05-11T19:24:25+00:00

I have a C application with many worker threads. It is essential that these

  • 0

I have a C application with many worker threads. It is essential that these do not block so where the worker threads need to write to a file on disk, I have them write to a circular buffer in memory, and then have a dedicated thread for writing that buffer to disk.

The worker threads do not block any more. The dedicated thread can safely block while writing to disk without affecting the worker threads (it does not hold a lock while writing to disk). My memory buffer is tuned to be sufficiently large that the writer thread can keep up.

This all works great. My question is, how do I implement something similar for stdout?

I could macro printf() to write into a memory buffer, but I don’t have control over all the code that might write to stdout (some of it is in third-party libraries).

Thoughts?
NickB

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:24:25+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:24 pm

    I like the idea of using freopen. You might also be able to redirect stdout to a pipe using dup and dup2, and then use read to grab data from the pipe.

    Something like so:

    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    
    #define MAX_LEN 40
    
    int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
      char buffer[MAX_LEN+1] = {0};
      int out_pipe[2];
      int saved_stdout;
    
      saved_stdout = dup(STDOUT_FILENO);  /* save stdout for display later */
    
      if( pipe(out_pipe) != 0 ) {          /* make a pipe */
        exit(1);
      }
    
      dup2(out_pipe[1], STDOUT_FILENO);   /* redirect stdout to the pipe */
      close(out_pipe[1]);
    
      /* anything sent to printf should now go down the pipe */
      printf("ceci n'est pas une pipe");
      fflush(stdout);
    
      read(out_pipe[0], buffer, MAX_LEN); /* read from pipe into buffer */
    
      dup2(saved_stdout, STDOUT_FILENO);  /* reconnect stdout for testing */
      printf("read: %s\n", buffer);
    
      return 0;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an application that has many different types of objects that each persist
I have inherited a VB6/Access application that we have developed and sold for many
I have a legacy VB6 application that was built using MSDE. As many client's
Now, I have a application that composed of single master and many workers. The
I have an application where I have potentially many processes must send a message
I imagine there are many of you out there who have developed an application
We have a project with many dll files which get loaded when the application
In my application, a user has_many tickets. Unfortunately, the tickets table does not have
When designing an application, does there come a point where you have too many
Many applications have grids that display data from a database table one page at

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.