Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6982081
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T18:14:28+00:00 2026-05-27T18:14:28+00:00

I have a C++ class that implements reference-counting and I want all users of

  • 0

I have a C++ class that implements reference-counting and I want all users of this class to inherit from this class only virtually so that no object ends up with more than one reference counter.

I’d like some way to assert this requirment either during compile time or at least during runtime.

Is there a way to achieve that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T18:14:29+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:14 pm

    I think wrapping the class would be the simplest option. Rather than directly inheriting from RefCounter create an intermediary class.

    struct RefCounterVirtPrivate_
    {
        int count;
    
        RefCounterVirt()
            : count( 0 )
        { }
    };
    
    struct RefCounter : public virtual RefCounterVirtPrivate_
    {
    };
    
    struct A : public RefCounter { };
    struct B : public RefCounter { };
    struct C : public A, public B { };
    

    Then everything can inherit from RefCounter without any need to care about virtual inheritence. You don’t even have to change any existing code — virtual inheritence of RefCounter itself should be harmless.

    This of course doesn’t guarantee people don’t inherit from RefCounterVirtPrivate_ directly, but that is why I’ve given it an obvious name. It’s harder to accidentally do this than forget a virtual keyword.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a class that implements the IDisposable interface. Something like this:
Given: I have an interface. I have only class that implements that interface. Question:
I have a custom class that implements that IComparable. This class is stored in
I have a custom class that implements ICollection , and this class is readonly,
How can I have a type reference that refers to any object that implements
I have a class that implements multiple interfaces. I would like to register these
I have a class that implements the IDisposable interface. I am using a webclient
I have a class that implements properties in a specific way, to handle some
I have a class that implements IComparable. public class MyClass : IComparable<MyClass> { public
I have an abstract class that implements IDisposable, like so: public abstract class ConnectionAccessor

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.