Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6046555
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T07:15:12+00:00 2026-05-23T07:15:12+00:00

I have a C++ class that writes its data out to a binary std::ofstream

  • 0

I have a C++ class that writes its data out to a binary std::ofstream. The class is storing the data as a boost:shared_array but I have eliminated this as the problem. The problem is with the call to write() on the ofstream.

The issue is that it seems to leak memory. The system it is running on is CentOS 64bit, GCC 4.1.2.

When looking at top and free when the application is running the executable itself does not continue to consume memory (as backed up by the memory profiler in Netbeans), but the amount of free system memory does decrease over time. What’s more, when the application exits this memory is not reclaimed!

This is a particular issue because the intention is to write out to disk continuously at around 50MB/s for hours on end. However, once we get down to around 90MB of free system memory it seems to “stabilize” and not reduce any further and the application continues to run OK. It does however screw up the system for the other running processes, which is bad, mmkay.

Below is an ever-so slightly simplified version of the class that is causing the grief.

class WritableMessage
{
public:
    WritableMessage();
    void write(std::ofstream* const idxStream, std::ofstream* const dataStream);

private:
    IdxRecord m_idx;
    boost::shared_array<char> m_data;
};

The ofstreams are initialised and destructed elsewhere but essentially they remain open for writing “forever”.

void WritableMessage::write(std::ofstream* const idxStream, std::ofstream* const dataStream)
{
    //Call the IdxRecord to write itself (just a call to idxStream->write())
    m_idx.write(idxStream, dataStream->tellp());

    //This is the main issue, because this data can be up to about 2MB in size
    //for each write.  Commenting out this line removes all issues with the memory leak
    dataStream->write(m_data.get(), m_idx.getMessageSize());

    //I'd expect the flush to clear any buffers that the ofstream maintains,
    //but apparently not
    idxStream->flush();
    dataStream->flush();
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T07:15:12+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:15 am

    It looks like you don’t have a problem, and that is just the system cache working as intended.
    Linux is very agressive on caching, so it will use almost all your free memory for this, but whenever an application needs more memory, it will release some of that memory and grant it to the application.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class that map objects to objects, but unlike dictionary it maps
I have class method that returns a list of employees that I can iterate
I have a class that I want to use to store properties for another
I have a class that I wish to expose as a remote service using
I have a class that looks like this public class SomeClass { public SomeChildClass[]
I have a class that creates several IDisposable objects, all of these objects are
I have a class that encapsulates tcp socket communications with a server. For each
I have a class that processes a 2 xml files and produces a text
I have a class that utilizes a directory swap method for the Environment.CurrentDirectory. The
I have a class that has a Generic type G In my class model

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.