Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 577545
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:09:54+00:00 2026-05-13T14:09:54+00:00

I have a c++ code that runs perfect on my linux machine (Ubuntu Karmic).

  • 0

I have a c++ code that runs perfect on my linux machine (Ubuntu Karmic).
When I try to run it on another version, I have all sort of shared libraries missing.

Is there any way to merge all shared libraries into single executable?

Edit:
I think I’ve asked the wrong question. I should have ask for a way to static-link my executable when it is already built.
I found the answer in ermine & statifier

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:09:54+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:09 pm

    There are 3 possible reasons you have shared libraries missing:

    • you are using shared libraries which do not exist by default on the other distribution, or you have installed them on your host, but not the other one, e.g. libDBI.so
    • you have over-specified the version at link time, e.g. libz.so.1.2.3 and the other machine has an API compatible (major version 1) but different minor version 2.3, which would probably work with your program if only it would link
    • the major version of the library has changed, which means it is incompatible libc.so.2 vs libc.so.1.

    The fixes are:

    • don’t link libraries which you don’t need that may not be on different distros, OR, install the additional libraries on the other machines, either manually or make them dependencies of your installer package (e.g. use RPM)
    • don’t specify the versions so tightly on the command line – link libz.so.1 instead of libz.so.1.2.3.
    • compile multiple versions against different libc versions.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have to call some code in a SharePoint site that runs under the
I have code that looks like: //System.Data.IDataRecord dr try { Consolidated = Utility.NullConvert.ToBool(dr[Constants.Data.Columns.cConsolidated], false);
I have some jQuery code that runs fine until I add the jQuery UI
I have the following code that runs figlet that has input as a range.
I have a SQLite/Python code that runs the query command as follows. def queryDB(self,
I have code that references a web service, and I'd like the address of
I have code that looks like the following, which works fine for displaying the
Following on from this question I now have code that can attach to a
Right now, I have code that looks something like this: Private Sub ShowReport(ByVal reportName
Hashtables have a syncroot property but generic dictionaries don't. If I have code that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.