Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9273823
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T16:12:14+00:00 2026-06-18T16:12:14+00:00

I have a C++ DLL I’ve written that sometimes requires another instance of itself

  • 0

I have a C++ DLL I’ve written that sometimes requires another instance of itself to carry out some actions. It would be nice if I didn’t have to split it into 2 different parts, especially because I don’t want any type of confusion that one of them is supposed to be “runnable”.

I’ve been looking at a few system-ey processes on Windows I could start and inject into. svchost and dllhost have both caught my eye; but they weren’t what I thought they were. Surely windows has some kind of generic DLL host I can use?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T16:12:16+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 4:12 pm

    Looks like rundll32 is designed just for this purpose, and is exactly what I was looking for.

    Command Line documentation:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/164787

    Reference on usage (SO):
    How to use Rundll32 to execute DLL Function?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have DLL and application that will call some function in this dll. For
I have a DLL, written in XE2 that takes a PChar as a parameter
I have a DLL with some COM objects . Sometimes, this objects crashes and
I have a dll(written in vb6) that compiles VB6 code. I'm reading the VB6.exe
I have a DLL that was written in C++ and called from a C#
I have a DLL, written in Delphi, which should determine some values and then
I have a dll project which uses some third party dlls. I would like
I have a DLL (written in C) that uses static thread local storage (
I have a dll that was written in c++, I need to use this
I'm pretty new in C#. I have Dll written on C++ by myself and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.