Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8646409
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T12:48:01+00:00 2026-06-12T12:48:01+00:00

I have a C program that polls some hardware sensors once a minute, and

  • 0

I have a C program that polls some hardware sensors once a minute, and adds the readings to a database. To ensure that the readings are taken closer to minutely (instead of minutely + overhead time), the program creates a child to do the actual work, and then sleeps for 60 seconds before creating another child.

The trouble I’m having is that the SIGCHLD from the children are interrupting the sleep(60), causing unlimited children to be created, instead of one per minute.

This is how I’ve been trying to do it:

while(1)
{

    /* Create a child to do the work */
    if((pid = fork()) < 0)
    {
        perror("fork");
        exit(1);
    }
    else if(pid > 0)
    {
        /*parent continues*/
        select(0, 0, NULL, NULL, &time);
        claim_children();
        continue;
    }
    /*Now in the child*/
    process_pvs();
}

I’ve also heard that select() can be used to achieve what I’m after by doing the following:

struct timeval time;

time.tv_sec = 60;
time.tv_usec = 0;

select(0, 0, 0, 0, time);

But for some reason this only works for 1 iteration in the while loop. After that the program does not wait at all, and creates children constantly.

So how can I best have my program do this without being interrupted by sigchld?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T12:48:02+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 12:48 pm

    You can ignore the child signal with

    signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN);
    

    This will stop the interrupts, but you need to be careful that you wait for all children. Normally a loop to catch them all.

    while(waitpid(-1, &status, WNOHANG) > 0);
    

    This only works well if you aren’t making other child processes elsewhere of course.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a program that continually polls the database for change in value of
I have a program that encrypts files, but adds the extension .safe to the
Assume I have some program that pulls airline data. Each airline data uses a
I have program that requires Python 3, but I develop Django and it uses
I have program that has a variable that should never change. However, somehow, it
I have program that runs fast enough. I want to see the number of
I have a program that gets a JSON from the server using getJSON and
I have a program that saves an image in a local directory and then
I have a program that reads from a file that grabs 4 bytes from
I have a program that I want to distribute, without giving the source code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.