Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7848309
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T18:09:28+00:00 2026-06-02T18:09:28+00:00

I have a c++ program that uses several very large arrays of doubles, and

  • 0

I have a c++ program that uses several very large arrays of doubles, and I want to reduce the memory footprint of this particular part of the program. Currently, I’m allocating 100 of them and they can be 100 Mb each.

Now, I do have the advantage, that eventually parts of these arrays become obsolete during later parts of the program’s execution, and there is little need to ever have the whole of any one of then in memory at any one time.

My question is this:

Is there any way of telling the OS after I have created the array with new or malloc that a part of it is unnecessary any more ?
I’m coming to the conclusion that the only way to achieve this is going to be to declare an array of pointers, each of which may point to a chunk say 1Mb of the desired array, so that old chunks that are not needed any more can be reused for new bits of the array. This seems to me like writing a custom memory manager which does seem like a bit of a sledgehammer, that’s going to create a bit of a performance hit as well

I can’t move the data in the array because it is going to cause too many thread contention issues. the arrays may be accessed by any one of a large number of threads at any time, though only one thread ever writes to any given array.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T18:09:30+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 6:09 pm

    It depends on the operating system. POSIX – including Linux – has the system call madvise to do improve memory performance. From the man page:

    The madvise() system call advises the kernel about how to handle paging input/output in the address range beginning at address addr and with size length bytes. It allows an application to tell the kernel how it expects to use some mapped or shared memory areas, so that the kernel can choose appropriate read-ahead and caching techniques. This call does not influence the semantics of the application (except in the case of MADV_DONTNEED), but may influence its performance. The kernel is free to ignore the advice.

    See the man page of madvise for more information.

    Edit: Apparently, the above description was not clear enough. So, here are some more details, and some of them are specific to Linux.

    You can use mmap to allocate a block of memory (directly from the OS instead of the libc), that is not backed by any file. For large chunks of memory, malloc is doing exactly the same thing. You have to use munmap to release the memory – regardless of the usage of madvise:

    void* data = ::mmap(nullptr, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
        MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
    // ...
    ::munmap(data, size);
    

    If you want to get rid of some parts of this chunk, you can use madvise to tell the kernel to do so:

    madvise(static_cast<unsigned char*>(data) + 7 * page_size,
        3 * page_size, MADV_DONTNEED);
    

    The address range is still valid, but it is no longer backed – neither by physical RAM nor by storage. If you access the pages later, the kernel will allocate some new pages on the fly and re-initialize them to zero. Be aware, that the dontneed pages are also part of the virtual memory size of the process. It might be necessary to make some configuration changes to the virtual memory management, e.g. activating over-commit.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have written a program that uses qhttp to get a webpage. This works
I have a program that I use on several sites. It uses require('config.php'); to
I have a program that uses pthread library to do the matrix multiplication of
I have a program that uses: ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(new WaitCallback(FireAttackProc), fireResult); On Windows7 and Vista it
I have a program that uses gethostbyname (in Windows) in order to convert IP
I have a program that uses three JTextField fields as the main data entry
Hey guys, I have a program that uses ajax to send a post to
I have a C# program that uses System.Data.OracleClient to access an oracle database. The
I have a winform program that uses Merge Replication to keep a local SQL
I have a program in C++ that uses the cryptopp library to decrypt/encrypt messages.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.