Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6176253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T00:04:03+00:00 2026-05-24T00:04:03+00:00

I have a central repository of objects Base which can produce various things. Base

  • 0

I have a central repository of objects Base which can produce various things. Base must keep a pointer to all objects, as a central update method has to iterate through all objects created by the Base instance. However, if the last handle to an object is destroyed, there is no need to keep it around any more so Base should get somehow informed that it is ok to delete the object now. Manual deletion of objects should be also possible, which would immediately invalidate all handles. Some code to clarify:

Base* b = new Base;
auto h0 = b->MakeFoo ();
auto h1 = h0;
b->Delete (h0);
// h1 is invalid here
{
  auto h2 = b->MakeFoo ();
}
// Base::Delete (h2) was called, as the last reference to it died
// shared_ptr/weak_ptr won't work here, as there would be still one
// reference in Base
auto h3 = b->MakeFoo ();
delete b;
// h3 is invalid here, hence shared_ptr is not enough
// weak_ptr would work here

Anything ready-to-use out there that I can adopt for this? Performance does not matter too much in this case.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T00:04:04+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 12:04 am

    How about this: Your class Base outputs shared_ptrs through the Make* functions, but only stores weak_ptrs internally. The update loop can check whether the weak pointer is still valid and remove it if not.

    Your final requirement that deleting the base will also kill existing objects is a bit trickier. You could go through the weak pointers in Base‘s destructor and send a self-destruct signal to all live objects, but that wouldn’t stop existing shared pointers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a central bare repository in which a team publish (push) their commits.
I have a central Mercurial repository, which configured to use HTTPS and requires authentication
I've just started with Mercurial, I have a 'central' repository on Bitbucket which I
I have a number of projects which I have outputting to a central repository
I have a central git repository that everyone pushes to for testing and integration,
I have a fairly involved managed data model which has a central object with
We have a Library Project that we use for all our central reused code
I have a server that contains a central git repository and one of my
Newbie alert! OK, I have a working central Mercurial repository that I've been working
we have a Git remote repository (in a way, our central repository) on the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.