Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 568753
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:13:19+00:00 2026-05-13T13:13:19+00:00

I have a centrally hosted database (MS SQL Server) and distributed clients save data

  • 0

I have a centrally hosted database (MS SQL Server) and distributed clients save data to it over the Internet. When the Internet connection goes down the client starts storing new data locally into a SQLite instance. When the Internet connection comes back online the accumulated local data is moved to the central db (inserted).

What’s the best way to handle unique IDs in this scenario? Other important info:

  • Local clients can remember their local db IDs for linking purposes while offline; therefore local ids must be generated as globally unique.

  • a unique ID in a local db should not be changed when merged back into the central db.

  • Different kinds of databases might be chosen for local operations in the future depending on the device – e.g. a JavaDb, a TextFileDb etc; therefore I think no single proprietary db feature should be used for this solution.

  • When changes are merged back to the central db all records must have unique IDs.

For this question assume a simple table named MyTable with fields: ID (the primary/unique key whatever type that should be) and Field1, Field2, Field3 The latter don’t really matter.

What first came to mind is using GUID. Is there a pattern or practice that’s better than this or a better way to carry this out?

Edit:
Using Microsoft .NET and ADO.NET

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:13:19+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:13 pm

    The GUID works.

    Beyond that, this is largely a solved problem with the Microsoft Sync Framework (you didn’t mention your development platform, so there is an assumption here). It is not tied to any db or datatype or protocol, and can be configured to work in a variety of offline scenarios (okay, this is starting to sound like a commercial…)

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sync/bb887625.aspx

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a web app hosted with GoDaddy (so the web server is in
If I have a collection of static constants that I want to declare centrally
I have a fairly involved managed data model which has a central object with
I have a web application that synchronizes with a central database four times per
I have really tried to understand how distributed version control systems alter the way
I want to centrally locate all of my application settings in the database. I
I have this stranger problem on Nivo slider that the images are not centrally
I have a Tomcat 6 server containing three webapps: a custom one as ROOT,
I have 2 types of site. The first is a data site, containing lots
For a client/server application I need to centrally store parts of the configuration information

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.