Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7084221
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T07:16:29+00:00 2026-05-28T07:16:29+00:00

I have a class A which has public methods and used by 100 other

  • 0

I have a class A which has public methods and used by 100 other classes implemented in different applications. Now I want to make those public methods as private so that no new classes access them, but I want the existing client classes to still access them.
But I don’t want to even touch those client classes , because the owners seldom allow even any ripple in their classes.

I checked

Can I access private members from outside the class without using friends?

C++: Is there a way to limit access to certain methods to certain classes without exposing other private members?

friend class with limited access

But all ( not all really ) demand a change in the client’s code. The client code should not change.

One straight forward way is to make all those N classes friends , But I am somewhat not comfortable doing that. Is there any pattern or an acceptable technique ( not a hack please ) to achieve this access restriction?
Thank you and I apologize if this is a duplicate.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T07:16:29+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 7:16 am

    Classes in C++ are made friends in order to indicate an special intentional strong coupling between classes. This use of friend infact enhances Encapsulation rather than break it as maybe the popular feeling.
    How?
    Without friendship the only non-hack way to expose the functionality to other class would be to provide public, get and set member functions,this in fact breaks encapsulation because all classes(even those who don’t need to) now have access to these methods and hence the members increasing the risk of potentially breaking down the class data.

    Back to your situation, If you have a 100 classes which need access to this particular class, then you already had the right design in-place by having those methods as public. Now trying to make those methods private to future classes is a trying to hack your existing design, Your design does not support it.

    Making the existing classes as friends does not ideally fit in the above mentioned criteria and hence is not a good choice for the scenario.
    However, given the situation there is no other way in which you can implement this. Making the existing classes as friend and granting them the special access seems the only way. This is still bad because the 100 classes which only had access to the few methods will now have access to your entire class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class which has two HashSet<String> collections as private members. Other classes
I have an DataMapper class which has some private and public methods. The DataMapper
I have a class which has the following constructor public DelayCompositeDesigner(DelayComposite CompositeObject) { InitializeComponent();
I have a class ReportingComponent<T> , which has the constructor: public ReportingComponent(IQueryable<T> query) {}
I have an arraylist which has a class datastructure. public class empRec { public
I have a class which has many small functions. By small functions, I mean
I have an class which has a enum property and a boolean property, based
I have a class which has a function to retrieve children elements from a
I have a class which has a private attribute which is a reference to
I have a class which has a private attribute vector rectVec; class A {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.