Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4100418
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T20:33:51+00:00 2026-05-20T20:33:51+00:00

I have a class below, i have extracted all the properties to a Interface

  • 0

I have a class below, i have extracted all the properties to a Interface but i don’t seem to be able to extract it… Obviously create a new object like

ITestItem item = new TestItem();

doesn’t give me access to Properties which is an instance of Meta class.

I also wanted to stop anyone from create an instance of Meta class outside of TestItem… i tried marking it as internal but that would allow me because Properties is public.

Also i am unsure whether i need to have an interface for META??

here is my class… can anyone help?

public class TestItem : ITestItem
{
    public bool Enabled { get; set; }

    public Meta Properties = new Meta();

    public List<int> Items { get; set; }

    public class Meta
    {
        internal Meta
        {
        }
        public string Name { get; set; }
    }

    public TestItem()
    {
        this.Items = new List<int>();
    }
}

EDIT
I have uppdated the class above to include an internal constructor for Meta so it can’t be instanciated outside the class.

Here is my interface i have (as suggested by giddy)… It says now that it doesn’t implement Properties

public interface ITestItem
{
    bool Enabled { get; set; }

    Meta Properties { get; set; };

    List<int> Items { get; set; }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T20:33:52+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 8:33 pm

    So you would:

    1. Not want to maybe use the term extract to interface, maybe your idea about interfaces is a little wrong. You want to do some reading here.

    2. Define the Meta class inside the Test class. Mark the constructor internal or private depending on where you want to create an instance.

    3. Make a property that exposes the Meta class outside of the Test class

      public class TestItem : ITestItem
      {
        public TestItem() 
        { 
           this.Properties = new Meta();//set it from here
           this.Items = new List<int>();
        }
      
        public bool Enabled { get; set; }
      
        //make it private set if you don't want an outsider setting it
        public Meta Properties {get;private set}
      
        public List<int> Items { get; set; }
      
      
        public class Meta
        {//make it private if you only create an instance here.
           internal Meta(){}
           public string Name { get; set; }
        }
      }
      

    You also add the Meta property to your interface:

    public interface ITestItem
    {
     bool Enabled { get;set;}
     Meta Properties { get;set;}
     List<int> Items { get;set;}
     void ScheduleItem();
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have class with collection as below public class MyClass:IXmlSerializable { int vesrion; private
I have class like this below shown. which contains the shopping items where the
I have posted my class below and with sample data. I need to pass
I have a class like the one below: class Foo { private: std::map<std::string, Bar*>
Does making the below class final (adding public final class) have any real impact
This question is related to a WPF application. I have a class as below
I have a class that implements InvocationHandler as below: public class MyProxyClass implements InvocationHandler
Code below is working well as long as I have class ClassSameAssembly in same
Say I have a class with three constructors, like the one below: public class
I have below code: class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Task[] tasks

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.