Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 324527
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T09:07:56+00:00 2026-05-12T09:07:56+00:00

I have a class CFoo with a private inner class CBar. I want to

  • 0

I have a class CFoo with a private inner class CBar. I want to implement a stream ouput operator for CFoo, which in turn uses a stream output for CBar in it’s implementation. I can get this working when CFoo is in the common namespace, but when i place it in a new namespace (namespace foobar), the operator can no longer access the private inner class. I suspect this has something to do with the full signature of the operator, but I can’t figure out the correct way to specify the friend declaration and the actual operator declaration so the implementation compiles. Can anyone suggest what I might be missing?
Note that it will compile if the stream implementation is done inline in the header, but I hate to expose implementation like this unnecessarily!

in foobar.h (just comment out the usefoobarnamespace to test the non-namespaced version):

#define usefoobarnamespace
#ifdef usefoobarnamespace
namespace foobar
{
#endif // usefoobarnamespace
    class CFoo
    {
    public:
        CFoo() {}
        ~CFoo();
        void AddBar();
    private:
        class CBar
        {
        public:
            CBar() {m_iVal = ++s_iVal;}
            int m_iVal;
            static int s_iVal;
        };

        std::vector<CBar*> m_aBars;

        friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& rcStream, CFoo& rcFoo);
        friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& rcStream, CFoo::CBar& rcBar);
    };
    std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& rcStream, CFoo& rcFoo);
    std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& rcStream, CFoo::CBar& rcBar);
#ifdef usefoobarnamespace
}
#endif // usefoobarnamespace

and in foobar.cpp:

#ifdef usefoobarnamespace
using namespace foobar;
#endif // usefoobarnamespace

int CFoo::CBar::s_iVal = 0;


CFoo::~CFoo()
{
    std::vector<CBar*>::iterator barIter;
    for (barIter = m_aBars.begin(); barIter != m_aBars.end(); ++barIter)
    {
        delete (*barIter);
    }
}

void CFoo::AddBar()
{
    m_aBars.push_back(new CBar());
}


std::ostream& operator<<( std::ostream& rcStream, CFoo& rcFoo )
{
    rcStream<<"CFoo(";
    std::vector<CFoo::CBar*>::iterator barIter;
    for (barIter = rcFoo.m_aBars.begin(); barIter != rcFoo.m_aBars.end(); ++barIter)
    {
        rcStream<<(*barIter);   
    }
    return rcStream<<")";
}

std::ostream& operator<<( std::ostream& rcStream, CFoo::CBar& rcBar )
{
    return rcStream<<"CBar("<<rcBar.m_iVal<<")";
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T09:07:57+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 9:07 am

    Simply put the code in the .cpp file into the namespace:

    namespace foobar {
    
    // your existing code
    
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have: class Car {..} class Other{ List<T> GetAll(){..} } I want to do:
Consider the following source code. I have two classes CBar and CFoo. CFoo inherits
I have class Employee which is something like this. class Emp { int EmpID;
I have to two class, class CFoo { public: static CFoo& GetInstance() { static
I have class method that returns a list of employees that I can iterate
I have: class MyClass extends MyClass2 implements Serializable { //... } In MyClass2 is
I have class A: public class ClassA<T> Class B derives from A: public class
I have class with internal property: internal virtual StateEnum EnrolmentState { get { ..getter
I have class with a member function that takes a default argument. struct Class
I have class Cab(models.Model): name = models.CharField( max_length=20 ) descr = models.CharField( max_length=2000 )

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.