I have a class declaring constants for my app
public class GroupConstants {
..
public static final int INTEGER_VALUE = 1;
public static final int LONG_VALUE = 2;
public static final int STRING_VALUE = 3;
..
}
In the code there is a set of switch statements
private static Object getValue(String stringValue, Parameter parameter) throws InvalidPatternException
{
Object result=null;
switch (parameter.getDataType())
{
case GroupConstants.STRING_VALUE: // String value
result=stringValue;
break;
case GroupConstants.INTEGER_VALUE: // Long value
case GroupConstants.LONG_VALUE:
case GroupConstants.BOOLEAN_VALUE:
case GroupConstants.DATE_VALUE:
..
}
I want to refactor the int constant values to be represented by an enum
public enum DataType {
UNKNOWN_VALUE(0,"unknown"),
INTEGER_VALUE(1,"integer"),
LONG_VALUE(2,"long"),
STRING_VALUE(3,"string"),
BOOLEAN_VALUE(4,"boolean"),
..
}
so my code might look like this
@Deprecated
public static final int INTEGER_VALUE = DataType.INTEGER_VALUE.getId();
and overtime i can change my switch statements. When i change the static final int reference to point to the enum all my switch statements break.
[javac] /home/assure/projects/tp/main/src/a/b/c/DDDDDManagerBean.java:1108: constant expression required
[javac] case GroupConstants.INTEGER_VALUE:
[javac] ^
[javac] /home/assure/projects/tp/main/src/a/b/c/ParameterComponent.java:203: constant expression required
[javac] case GroupConstants.INTEGER_VALUE:
[javac] ^
[javac] /home/assure/projects/tp/main/src/a/b/c/ParameterComponent.java:268: constant expression required
[javac] case GroupConstants.INTEGER_VALUE:
[javac] ^
[javac] /home/assure/projects/tp/main/src/a/b/c/ParameterComponent.java:316: constant expression required
[javac] case GroupConstants.INTEGER_VALUE:
[javac] ^
[javac] /home/assure/projects/tp/main/src/a/b/c/ParameterComponent.java:436: constant expression required
[javac] case GroupConstants.INTEGER_VALUE:
I don’t want to be forced to change all the switches yet, so its there a clean work around?
That won’t work. The problem is that the
getId()call means that the constant’s value expression is not a compile-time constant expression according to the JLS. Refer to JLS 15.28 Constant Expressions for the gory details, and you will see that method calls are not allowed in constant expressions.I don’t think there is any workaround, apart for a large-scale change to all of the switch statements. But I wouldn’t worry. Your IDE should be able help you find and replaces all occurrences of the old constants.
FOLLOWUP
The following code from your comment won’t work either:
Firstly,
INTEGER_VALUE_HOLDERis not a “constant variable” according to the definition in JLS 4.12.4 Final Variables. Therefore neither isINTEGER_VALUE.Secondly, the initializer expression for a static cannot refer to
this, andINTEGER_VALUE_HOLDERis really another way of sayingthis.INTEGER_VALUE_HOLDER.