Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 241737
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T20:46:43+00:00 2026-05-11T20:46:43+00:00

I have a class Foo which has several methods like button_0_0 , button_0_1 ,

  • 0

I have a class Foo which has several methods like button_0_0, button_0_1, button_0_2, button_1_0, etc.

I would like to be able to access these alternatively via the following syntax:

foo.button[0][1]
foo.button[1][2]
# etc.

I know I could just create a @button instance variable and iterate through all the button_* accessors and add them that way, but that seems a bit kludgy and doesn’t really follow the “ruby way” of doing things.

I was wondering if there was a more succinct, Rubyish solution to this problem (maybe by using method_missing?)—Does anyone know a better way of doing this?

(I’ve figured this out partway, but I get stuck at the square brackets because [] calls a new method on the missing method…)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T20:46:43+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:46 pm
    class Foo
      def button
        Button.new(self)
      end
      def button_0_1
        "zero-one"
      end
      def button_0_2
        "zero-two"
      end
    
      private
      class Button
        def initialize(parent)
          @parent           = parent
          @first_dimension  = nil
        end
        def [](index)
          if @first_dimension.nil?
            @first_dimension = index
            self
          else
            @parent.send("button_#{@first_dimension}_#{index}")
          end
        end
      end
    end
    puts Foo.new.button[0][1]
    puts Foo.new.button[0][2]
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 122k
  • Answers 122k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm not sure you have a real problem here, but… May 12, 2026 at 12:42 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer See here - are you facing the same problem? The… May 12, 2026 at 12:42 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The reason that Response.Cookies["temp"].Expires = DateTime.UtcNow; is not working is… May 12, 2026 at 12:42 am

Related Questions

Context: .NET 3.5, VS2008. I'm not sure about the title of this question, so
I have an associative array (object) of the following construction var menu = new
I'm trying to use templates to get std:list of items, where each item has
The schema: (psuedocode) I have a bean, called BaseEntity... @Entity class BaseEntity { @OneToMany

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.