Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 769941
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T18:25:06+00:00 2026-05-14T18:25:06+00:00

I have a class like this internal class Report { public Company TargetCompany {

  • 0

I have a class like this

internal class  Report
{
    public Company TargetCompany { get; private set; }

    .... // other stuff
}

I do not want any one to be able to do this

Report r = GetReport();

Company c = r.TargetCompany;

but instead always use

r.TargetCompany 

when they want access to the Company variable.

Is that possible? Does that even make sense?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T18:25:06+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:25 pm

    You can expose a proxy interface in Report, which calls the equivalent interface in Company, and make Company private, so that you completely control (encapsulate even) access to the Company object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class like this, public class person { name Name {set; get;}
I have a class like this: class MyClass{ public: MyClass(int Mode); private: std::map <
I have a class like this public class foo { private void getThread() {
I have a class like this: public class Contest { List<ContestTeam> Teams { get;
So I have a class that looks like this: internal class MyClass { public
I have got class declared like this: internal private abstract class BoxGroup<TS> : IBoxGroup
I have a class like this: public class Stretcher : Panel { public static
I have a class like this: public class myClass { public List<myOtherClass> anewlist =
I have a class like this: class A { private: B* ptr; } But
I have a class like this class GUI : public QWidget, public QThread When

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.