Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8779329
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T19:45:36+00:00 2026-06-13T19:45:36+00:00

I have a class parametrized with a number, but only some values are in

  • 0

I have a class parametrized with a number, but only some values are in fact valid parameters. In order to hide implementation from user and to prevent invalid instantiating, I did this:

// foo.hpp
class IClass
{
  virtual void doStuff() = 0;
};

IClass& getHiddenClass(const bool& randomCondition);

// foo.cpp
template <unsigned x>
class HiddenClass : public IClass
{
public:
  void doStuff()
  {
    /* some code using x */
  }
};

IClass& getHiddenClass(const bool& randomCondition)
{
  static HiddenClass<42> ifRandomCondition;
  static HiddenClass<9000> ifNotRandomCondition;

  if (randomCondition)
    return ifRandomCondition;
  else
    return ifNotRandomCondition;
}

Is it OK are is there a better workaround? This example is simplified and abstract, but I also won’t need to store a large number of valid instances.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T19:45:38+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 7:45 pm

    Use static_assert to prevent invalid instantiation, available in C++11.

    I don’t understand the purpose of your “hidden class”. Interfaces are meant to do exactly this – to hide the implementation from users and only let them have a predefined set of operations that they can use. Declare your interface in a separate header file and share it with user. Inherit your concrete class from the interface (in another, non-shared header file) and implement it in cpp file (again, non-shared).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have this class: template</*some other parameters here */class toggle> class Foo {
I try to override my parametrized method in scala, I have an abstract class
I have created two Hudson String Parameters in my parametrized build configuration: svnRoot ,
supposed we know that ViewGroup extends View. Further we have a generic, parametrized class
I have an abstract test class that has two type parameters. I need to
I have one test class with two methods, one is parametrized and the second
I am trying to understand Puppet parameterized classes. I have a parameterized class defined
I have a parameterized generic class X which takes a type T. On which
I have Class and Student objects. Both have collection of another as property. Which
I have class LegacyClass which inherits OldBaseClass. I'm considering a change to introduce a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.