Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4122700
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T23:30:56+00:00 2026-05-20T23:30:56+00:00

I have a class SomeMutableData with a public clone() method. I want to make

  • 0

I have a class SomeMutableData with a public clone() method. I want to make sure, that no thread ever sees an inconsistent state (assuming the instances will be passed around using the holder only). I assume using synchronization is the safest possibility, right?

public final class ThreadSafeHolder {
    public ThreadSafeHolder(SomeMutableData data) {
        storeData(data);
    }

    public synchronized SomeMutableData cloneData() {
        return data.clone();
    }
    public synchronized void storeData(SomeMutableData data) {
        this.data = data.clone();
    }

    private SomeMutableData data;
}

Is the following as safe as the first approach?

public final class ThreadSafeHolder2 {
    public ThreadSafeHolder2(SomeMutableData data) {
        storeData(data);
    }

    public SomeMutableData cloneData() {
        return data.get().clone();
    }
    public void storeData(SomeMutableData data) {
        this.data.set(data.clone());
    }

    private final AtomicReference<SomeMutableData> data
        = new AtomicReference<SomeMutableData>();
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T23:30:56+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 11:30 pm

    Since clone() is much more expensive than synchronized, it hardly matters from a performance point of view.

    However the second example is as thread safe and marginally faster.

    the only differences is that the first example you can do this. (Whether you like this or not 😉

    synchronized(theHolder) {
        SomeMutableData smd = theHolder.cloneData();
        smd.updateIt();
        theHolder.storeData(smd);
    }
    

    BTW: I don’t think the holder should extend the type it is wrapping.

    EDIT: A more GC friendly way is to use the following approach. you can write copyFrom() such that no objects are created either setting or getting the data.

    public final class ThreadSafeHolder {
        private final SomeMutableData data = new SomeMutableData();
    
        public ThreadSafeHolder(SomeMutableData data) {
            copyFrom(data);
        }
    
        public synchronized void copyTo(SomeMutableData data) {
            data.copyFrom(this.data);
        }
    
        public synchronized void copyFrom(SomeMutableData data) {
            this.data.copyFrom(data);
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have class method: public object MyMethod(object obj) { // I want to add
I have class method that returns a list of employees that I can iterate
I have class A: public B { ...} vector<A*> v; I want to do
I have class in server side and I want use method of this class
I have class which has a method that needs to return three DataTables. I
I have class which have one public method Start , one private method and
I have class A: public class ClassA<T> Class B derives from A: public class
I have class with a member function that takes a default argument. struct Class
I have: class Car {..} class Other{ List<T> GetAll(){..} } I want to do:
I have class Fred { public: void inspect() const {}; void modify(){}; }; int

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.