Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 623239
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:04:17+00:00 2026-05-13T19:04:17+00:00

I have a class Test which has an array of Foos. I want to

  • 0

I have a class Test which has an array of Foos. I want to provide access to the Foos without exposing the ivar directly. I’m trying to make this KVC compliant (also to pave the way for KVO compliance). I have:

Test.h

@interface Test : NSObject
{
    NSMutableArray *foos;
}

@property (readonly, copy) NSMutableArray *foos;

@end

Test.m

- (id) init
{
    self = [super init];
    if (self != nil)
    {
        foos = [[NSMutableArray array] retain];
    }
    return self;
}

- (NSMutableArray*) foos
{
    return [self mutableArrayValueForKey:@"foos"];
}

- (NSUInteger)countOfFoos
{
    return [foos count];
}

- (id)objectInFoosAtIndex:(NSUInteger)index
{
    return [foos objectAtIndex:index];
}

- (NSArray *)foosAtIndexes:(NSIndexSet *)indexes
{
    return [foos objectsAtIndexes:indexes];
}

- (void)insertObject:(id)key inFoosAtIndex:(NSUInteger)index
{
    [foos insertObject:key atIndex:index];
}

- (void)insertFoos:(NSArray *)foosArray atIndexes:(NSIndexSet *)indexes
{
    [foos insertObjects:foosArray atIndexes:indexes];
}

- (void)removeObjectFromFoosAtIndex:(NSUInteger)index
{
    [foos removeObjectAtIndex:index];
}

- (void)removeFoosAtIndexes:(NSIndexSet *)indexes
{
    [foos removeObjectsAtIndexes:indexes];
}

This enters an infinite loop when a client tries to add a Foo:

Test *test = [[Test alloc] init];
NSMutableArray *foos = test.foos;
[foos addObject:@"adding object"]; // infinite loop here

What am I doing wrong?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:04:17+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:04 pm
    - (NSMutableArray*) foos
    {
        return [self mutableArrayValueForKey:@"foos"];
    }
    

    An accessor should not use KVC to get the value of the property being accessed; the idea is that KVC goes through the accessors, because the accessors are closer to the value than KVC is.

    The correct implementation of foos should return a copy, mutable or otherwise, of the array. Here’s how I’d do it:

    - (NSArray *) foos
    {
        return [[foos copy] autorelease];
    }
    

    I would also make all of the accessors public. Anything that wants to mutate the array or randomly access elements at specific indexes can do so that way. It’s still safe and encapsulated because they’re going through your accessors, not directly accessing the array.

    There’s not really any reason to use the KVC protocol methods yourself unless you don’t know what key you’ll access at the time you write the code. For example, if you were writing the nib loader or the Cocoa Bindings system, you would use KVC.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a JUnit test class in which I have several static final int
I have a dll called Test.dll in which I have a class called ABC
I have a Query model: class Query < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :test end which is
You have a Python class which needs an equals test. Python should use duck-typing
I have some classes(call it Class A) which I would like to unit test
I have a pickle dump which has an array of foo.Bar() objects. I am
I have a class and inside that class is this function which has a
Using Java, I have a class which retrieves a webpage as a byte array.
I have a class which has a well-defined responsibility - to Enrich an object
I have a Product class which has a 1-to-many association to itself (composite pattern).

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.