Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8658061
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T15:40:34+00:00 2026-06-12T15:40:34+00:00

I have a class that acts like a basic stack. In my member function

  • 0

I have a class that acts like a basic stack. In my member function definitions i get an error at every instance of vec. The error tells me that the expression must have a class type. What must I do to fix this issue?

class Stack{
    public:
        Stack();
        Stack & push(double & t);
        double pop() const;
        unsigned long long getElements();
    private:
        vector <double> vec[10];
        static double answer;
};

Stack::Stack(){
    answer=0;
}

Stack & Stack::push(double & t){
    vec.push_back(t);
    return *this;
}

double Stack::pop()const{
    return vec.pop_back();
}

unsigned long long Stack::getElements(){
    return vec.size();

}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T15:40:35+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 3:40 pm

    There are a number of issues here, and after fixing them I got:

    #include <vector>
    using namespace std;
    class Stack{
        public:
            Stack();
            Stack & push(double & t);
            double pop();
            unsigned long long getElements();
        private:
            vector <double> vec;
            static double answer;
    };
    
    Stack::Stack(){
        answer=0;
    }
    
    Stack & Stack::push(double & t){
        vec.push_back(t);
        return *this;
    }
    
    double Stack::pop(){
        double ret = vec.back();
        vec.pop_back();
        return ret;
    }
    
    unsigned long long Stack::getElements(){
        return vec.size();
    
    }
    

    The changes I made were:

    1. missing include of vector and namespace default for std.
    2. pop_back returns void – need to get the element to return first.
    3. Shouldn’t declare pop as const, as it does change the vector (you can have the returned value be a const).
    4. removed [10] on vec declaration. It is not a C array.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class which contains a static field that acts like a singleton
I have a class that acts like this at the moment: public class MyClass
I have a RESTful API call that acts like this: HTTP GET http://addresss:port/settings/{setting} which
I have class that looks like this: class A { public: class variables_map vm
I have a Class that has a private variable with a public setter/getter function:
I have a class that has several member classes as attributes. The constructor of
I want to write a container class that acts like a dictionary (actually derives
I understand that StringIO acts like a file object, duck-typing what you would get
I have a class that essentially acts as a light weight wrapper class around
I have a need for a container that acts like the following. It has

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.