Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 270013
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T23:55:51+00:00 2026-05-11T23:55:51+00:00

I have a class that currently has several methods that take integer parameters. These

  • 0

I have a class that currently has several methods that take integer parameters. These integers map to operations that the application can perform. I’d like to make the class generic so that the consumers of the class can provide an enum type that they have with all the operations in it, then the methods will take parameters of that enum type. However, I want them to be able to not specify a generic type at all, and have it default back to integers with no change in syntax from the current way. Is this possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T23:55:52+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:55 pm

    You can’t do it in the definition of the class:

    var foo = new MyGenericClass(); // defaults to integer... this doesn't work
    var bar = new MyGenericClass<MyEnum>(); // T is a MyEnum
    

    If really value the implicitness of the default type being int, you’ll have to do it with a static factory method, although I don’t see the value of it.

    public class MyGenericClass<T>
    {
        public static MyGenericClass<T> Create()
        {
            return new MyGenericClass<T>();
        }
        public static MyGenericClass<int> CreateDefault()
        {
            return new MyGenericClass<int>();
        }
    }
    

    See below for how you really don’t benefit from the above.

    var foo = MyGenericClass<MyEnum>.Create();
    var bar1 = MyGenericClass.CreateDefault(); // doesn't work
    var bar2 = MyGenericClass<int>.CreateDefault(); // works, but what's the point
    

    If you want to take it even farther, you can create a static factory class that will solve this, but that’s an even more ridiculous solution if you’re doing it for no other reason than to provide a default type:

    public static class MyGenericClassFactory
    {
        public static MyGenericClass<T> Create<T>()
        {
            return new MyGenericClass<T>();
        }
        public static MyGenericClass<int> Create()
        {
            return new MyGenericClass<int>();
        }
    }
    
    var foo = MyGenericClassFactory.Create(); // now we have an int definition
    var bar = MyGenericClassFactory.Create<MyEnum>();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 209k
  • Answers 209k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Just refer to each field separately. {{ nhl_form.league }} will… May 12, 2026 at 9:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer CSS: bottom: 0; May 12, 2026 at 9:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer DataContext has what you need in it already. public IQueryable<T>… May 12, 2026 at 9:43 pm

Related Questions

I'm writing an ASP.NET web service using C# that has a DoLookup() function. For
I am providing a web service to be called by external companies. The required
I've been utilizing the command pattern in my Flex projects, with asynchronous callback routes
I currently have a LINQ query implemented as a method of my DataContext class.

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.