Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5849395
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T12:59:36+00:00 2026-05-22T12:59:36+00:00

I have a class that has about 20-some methods in it. Each one does

  • 0

I have a class that has about 20-some methods in it. Each one does some web service message processing. I just had to make a change to it, and realized that every one of these methods has the exact same try/catch around it:

try
{
    /* *** actual processing specific to each method goes here *** */
}
catch (FaultException<CustomException> cfex)
{
    // common stuff
}
catch (CustomException cfex)
{
    // common stuff
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
    // common stuff
}
finally
{
    FinalizeServiceCall(wsBus, wsMessage, response, logProps);
}

My question is; instead of having this exact same try/catch block in every method, is there a way to make it common? My thoughts were that .NET has stuff like TransactionScope that somehow detects if an exception occurs when leaving that block. Is there I was I can leverage something like that to make a common try/catch block? Any other ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T12:59:37+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 12:59 pm

    I would do it like this:

    Create a method that contains the try/catch and pass an Action into it and execute that action inside the try part:

    public void Method1()
    {
        Action action = () =>
        {
            // actual processing of Method 1
        };
        SafeExecutor(action);
    }
    
    public void Method1b()
    {
        SafeExecutor(() =>
        {
            // actual processing of Method 1
        });
    }
    
    public void Method2(int someParameter)
    {
        Action action = () =>
        {
            // actual processing of Method 2 with supplied parameter
            if(someParameter == 1)
            ...
        };
        SafeExecutor(action);
    }
    
    public int Method3(int someParameter)
    {
        Func<int> action = () =>
        {
            // actual processing of Method 3 with supplied parameter
            if(someParameter == 1)
                return 10;
            return 0;
        };
        return SafeExecutor(action);
    }
    
    private void SafeExecutor(Action action)
    {
        SafeExecutor(() => { action(); return 0; });
    }
    
    private T SafeExecutor<T>(Func<T> action)
    {
        try
        {
            return action();
        }
        catch (FaultException<CustomException> cfex)
        {
            // common stuff
        }
        catch (CustomException cfex)
        {
            // common stuff
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            // common stuff
        }
        finally
        {
            FinalizeServiceCall(wsBus, wsMessage, response, logProps);
        }
    
        return default(T);
    }
    

    The two versions of SafeExecutor give you the possibility to handle methods with and without return types.
    Method1b shows that you don’t need the variable action in your methods, you can inline it, if you think that’s more readable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class that has some properties. And I want something that calculates
Let's say I have one class Foo that has a bunch of logic in
You have a method on a class that has 2 parameters, one of which
I have a class that has a Generic type G In my class model
I have a class that has a vector of another class objects as a
Let's say I have a class that has a member called data which is
I have a base class that has a private static member: class Base {
I have an entity class that has a property with an underlying db column
I have a page base class that has no .aspx file and so I
I have a base class Foo that has an Update() function, which I want

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.