Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5937601
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T15:33:53+00:00 2026-05-22T15:33:53+00:00

I have a class that have a relationship with itself: public class Person {

  • 0

I have a class that have a relationship with itself:

public class Person
{
    public long ID { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public virtual Person Mother { get; set; }
    public virtual Person Father { get; set; } 
}

When EF 4.1 is trying to map this class I’m getting the follow error:
‘Unable to determine the principal end of an association between the types ‘Model.Person’ and ‘Model.person’. The principal end of this association must be explicitly configured using either the relationship fluent API or data annotations.’

I already tried the solution of the topic EF 4.1 – Model Relationships without success.

How I can fix that?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T15:33:54+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 3:33 pm

    Because it’s naturally a one-to-many relationship (a person must have one father and one mother but can have many sons and daughters) I’d model it like this:

    protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Entity<Person>()
            .HasRequired(p => p.Father)
            .WithMany();
    
        modelBuilder.Entity<Person>()
            .HasRequired(p => p.Mother)
            .WithMany();
    }
    

    This will create two required foreign keys in the database table with name Mother_ID and Father_ID by convention.

    Edit

    If you want to be able to create persons without Mother and Father you can make the relation optional instead of required:

    protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Entity<Person>()
            .HasOptional(p => p.Father)
            .WithMany();
    
        modelBuilder.Entity<Person>()
            .HasOptional(p => p.Mother)
            .WithMany();
    }
    

    Then the foreign keys in the database table are nullable.

    If you don’t like the default column names for your foreign keys (Mother_ID and Father_ID) you can customize the column names in your mapping:

    protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Entity<Person>()
            .HasOptional(p => p.Father)
            .WithMany()
            .Map(m => m.MapKey("FatherID"));
    
        modelBuilder.Entity<Person>()
            .HasOptional(p => p.Mother)
            .WithMany()
            .Map(m => m.MapKey("MotherID"));
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class that looks like this public class SomeClass { public SomeChildClass[]
I've got two theoretical domain objects: public class Person { public virtual int Id
Consider the following simplified objects and relationships: public class Job{ int JobId; String name;
I have class method that returns a list of employees that I can iterate
I have a class that I want to use to store properties for another
I have a class that map objects to objects, but unlike dictionary it maps
I have a class that I wish to expose as a remote service using
I have a class that creates several IDisposable objects, all of these objects are
I have a class that encapsulates tcp socket communications with a server. For each
I have a class that processes a 2 xml files and produces a text

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.