Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 112501
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:33:17+00:00 2026-05-11T02:33:17+00:00

I have a class that i want to push_back into a deque. The problem

  • 0

I have a class that i want to push_back into a deque. The problem is when i push back i need the original object to be changed thus i need a non const copy ctor. Now if i implement that my const copy ctor gets called. If i removed the const ctor i get an compile error about no available ctors. How do i implement this in a way that i can modify the original struct when i pass it in? i need to modify it bc the class destructs objects when it goes out of scope and i would like to tell it not to do so when there is another instance around. I cant use boost since my platform doesnt support it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:33:17+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:33 am

    Your problem is that a fundamental requirement of standard containers is that objects are copy-constructible. That not only means that they have a copy constructor, but that also means that if you copy the object, the copy and the original are the same.

    Your object, however, resembles a move-constructor semantic. That is, after a move, the new object owns the resource, and the old object is empty. That’s not supported by deque as of C++03. That is, by the way, the same reason that forbids putting auto_ptr into a container.

    The next C++ version, called c++0x will support those move semantics by introducing special move constructors. Until then, you will have to use an object that shares ownership when you want to put it into a standard container. That means if you copy your object, and the original goes out of scope, the owned resource is not freed until all the copies go out of scope. Consider using boost::shared_ptr for example, or wrap it into your class, if you don’t want to program your own class managing that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 165k
  • Answers 165k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Categories extend the original class, but they don't subclass it,… May 12, 2026 at 12:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Haven't tested this, but it's something like: RewriteRule \.php$ -… May 12, 2026 at 12:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer "0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1" is the IPv6 loopback address as defined in RFC… May 12, 2026 at 12:54 pm

Related Questions

I have a class that is currently in a .lib file: class __declspec(dllexport) ReportData
I have a pointer to an int. int index = 3; int * index_ptr
I have a template class, C_Foo<T>, which is specialised in a number of ways.
I have a class Class which has a member std::list, I want to search

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.