Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 761759
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T15:52:36+00:00 2026-05-14T15:52:36+00:00

I have a class that in order to do it’s job needs to have

  • 0

I have a class that in order to do it’s job needs to have 8 different property values set.
I want to make sure that all 8 properties are set before trying to execute a method.
I currently have all the parameters passed in and set via the constructor.
Is there a better way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T15:52:36+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:52 pm

    You can allow the object to be created without specifying values for all the properties and then the method would throw an InvalidOperationException if called before the object state is valid for the method call to execute, which in this case would mean that all 8 properties would have valid values.

    This way you give more flexibility to the consumer. It can create a new instance at one moment, set it’s properties at another and only then call the method. This is a “pattern” that is used through the .NET codebase and to which developers are already used.


    Update:

    This also simplifies things if you’re adding other methods that don’t need the full set of properties to be initialized. Yes we could add another constructor overload with the new set of properties, but what if we have 2 methods that both need one property of the same type to be initialized? This is not solvable by using constructor overloads.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I Have a Class that needs to make an HTTP request to a server
I have a private class variable that holds a collection of order items: Private
I have class that represents users. Users are divided into two groups with different
I have a class that is mapped in fluent nhibernate but I want one
I have a class that modifies data via some extension methods. In order to
I have an Order class that has a list of OrderTransactions and I mapped
I have a class that inherits from MemoryStream in order to provide some buffering.
I have a class that I want to serialize [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlTypeAttribute(Namespace = http://xyz.com/schema)] public class
I have one class that inherits another. I want to use reflection to cycle
I have a class that first needs to call the derived class constructor before

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.