Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6204715
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T05:08:43+00:00 2026-05-24T05:08:43+00:00

I have a class that requires another class to be specified, but I don’t

  • 0

I have a class that requires another class to be specified, but I don’t want the MVC ModelState validator to check whether the secondary model is valid. Is this possible?

Here’s a brief overview:

My entities look something like this:

public class WidgetType
{
    public long Id { get; private set; }

    [Required]
    public string Name { get; set; }

    ...
}

public class Widget
{
    public long Id { get; private set; }

    [Required]
    public string Name { get; set; }

    [Required]
    public WidgetType WidgetType { get; set; }

    ...
}

I have them encapsulated in a WidgetViewModel class that I’m passing to/from the View like this:

public class WidgetViewModel
{
    public Widget Widget { get; set; }

    public ICollection<WidgetType> WidgetTypes
    {
        get
        {
            return _repository.GetWidgets();
        }
    }

    ...
}

My view looks something like this:

...
@Html.DropDownListFor( m => m.Widget.WidgetType.Id, new SelectList( new EquipmentViewModel().EquipmentTypes, "Id", "Name" ) )
...

All of this works except for validation. ModelState.IsValid is always false because "Widget.WidgetType.Name" is required. I need the user to select a WidgetType, but I don’t want ModelState to be validated deeper than “Widget.WidgetType.Id” (which should be all that Widget needs for its foreign key?).

Is there a better way to do this? I feel like there should be some way to validate without recursively inspecting deeper into the properties, but I can’t find it. What am I missing…?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T05:08:45+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 5:08 am

    http://blog.stevensanderson.com/2010/02/19/partial-validation-in-aspnet-mvc-2/ gives an example of partial validation

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class that I want to use to store properties for another
I have a class that requires a specific method to be called before being
I have a class that executes the MSNP15 protocol. The protocol requires clients to
I have a class that map objects to objects, but unlike dictionary it maps
Lets say, for example, that I have a class that requires the use of
I want to give access to protected properties to another class. I have been
Say I have: class DecisionTree(private val instances: Array[Instance]){ and I want to calculate another
Is there a way to require that a class have a particular abstract member?
I have an intermediary class extending System.Web.UI.Page for all of my pages that require
I have a standard active record model with an attributes that is required: class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.