Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7053465
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T03:30:31+00:00 2026-05-28T03:30:31+00:00

I have a class which implements the following interface: IUser { string UserName {

  • 0

I have a class which implements the following interface:

IUser {
    string UserName { get; set; }
}

The default class which implements this interface (User) and the interface are defined within the core library and ideally i do not wish to modify this. However i need to add an additional property to my user therefore i have added a custom class which also implements the IUser interface. I have mapped this the same as i mapped the User class but with the additional fields. However if i try to say:

session.Get<IUser>(1);

It throws the error:

Ambiguous persister for Security.IUser implemented by more than one
hierarchy: Web.Security.Models.User
Security.Models.User

I can appreciate why i get this as NHibernate has no way to tell which is my preferred type to use. I was wondering if it was possible to prompt NHibernate this in the mapping?

I’d appreciate the help. Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T03:30:31+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 3:30 am

    NHibernate has the notion of entity name

    // in UserMap
    EntityName("user");
    
    // in SpecialUserMap
    EntityName("specialUser");
    
    // then in Query
    (IUser)session.Get("user", 1);
    // or
    (IUser)session.Get("specialUser", 1);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an interface A , which class B implements. The following generic method
I have the following class which uses BinaryReader internally and implements IDisposable. class DisposableClass
I want to have a class which implements an interface, which specifies the specific
I have an Entity class which Implements IWeightable: Public Interface IWeightable Property WeightState As
I have a WCF service, which implements interface PosData.ISampleService in class PosData.SampleService . The
I have a business object class BusinessObject which implements an interface IAlternateInterface. I already
I have the following tricky problem: I have implemented a (rather complicated) class which
I have a class which implements UserControl. In .NET 2005, a Dispose method is
I have a factory class, DocumentLoaderFactory , which simply returns an instance that implements
I have a generic interface IConstrained which is implemented by the generic Constrained class.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.