Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 514731
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:33:18+00:00 2026-05-13T07:33:18+00:00

I have a class which needs to be a singleton. It implemented using a

  • 0

I have a class which needs to be a singleton. It implemented using a static member pointer:

class MySinglton
{
public:
    static MySinglton& instance() { ... }
private:
    static MySinglton* m_inst;
};

This class is compiled into a .lib which is used in multiple dlls in the same application. The problem is that each dll sees a different m_inst. since it is compiled and linked separatly.

What is simple way to solve this problem?

Separating the .lib to its own dll is not an option. it must be a .lib.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:33:19+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:33 am

    A solution could be transferring the instantiation to the application, and the DLLs will get reference to it during initialization.
    It may not be as elegant as you’d like, but it would do it.

    Need to know what’s the REAL problem behind your question.
    The answer may not be in the form you expect it. 😉

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a c++ class which needs to interact with a .NET dll using
I have a class which contains a static field that acts like a singleton
I have a singleton class which I would like to be created using Spring's
I have a singleton class which needs to be intialized by castle? I'm a
i have a validation class which needs improving. If I require some custom validation
You have a Python class which needs an equals test. Python should use duck-typing
I have a initApp.as which instantiates a class which needs to access the currentState
I've recently implemented a singleton class, and within it I've declared a static generic
I have a singleton bean which needs for each call of a function to
I have a singleton delayed-transaction manager class, which is responsible for enqueueing and dequeueing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.