Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 300107
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T06:53:02+00:00 2026-05-12T06:53:02+00:00

I have a class whose constructor is defined as internal, which means I cannot

  • 0

I have a class whose constructor is defined as internal, which means I cannot instantiate it. While that may make sense, I would still like to do it once for debugging and research purposes.

Is it possible to do so with Reflection? I know I can access Private/Internal Members, but can I call an internal constructor?

Or, as the constructor does nothing important, can I use reflection to say “Look, just give me an instance of the class without calling the constructor, I’ll do it’s work manually”?

Performance and “Stability” is not an issue here, as it’s not production code.

Edit: Just as clarification: Sadly, I don’t control the other assembly and don’t have it’s source code, I merely try to understand how it works as it’s documentation is next to non-existent, but I am supposed to interface with it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T06:53:02+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 6:53 am

    A FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject method exists (Namespace: System.Runtime.Serialization), it supposedly calls no constructors, if you really want to try out that approach.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 202k
  • Answers 202k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No standard way sorry. You can do it fairly easily… May 12, 2026 at 8:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Because of the way operator& is overloaded, you need to… May 12, 2026 at 8:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If everything is part of the same solution and built… May 12, 2026 at 8:23 pm

Related Questions

Given the following class definitions: public class BaseClass { public string SomeProp1 { get;
I have made a custom Attribute here named AAtribute, and for instance a class
I have an abstract base class and I want to declare a field or
I have a class whose constructor takes a const reference to a string. This

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.