Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7987695
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T12:13:21+00:00 2026-06-04T12:13:21+00:00

I have a class with a virtual property ( public virtual List<Ingredients> ), but

  • 0

I have a class with a virtual property (public virtual List<Ingredients>), but in some cases I don’t want to get that data. How can I do this? I know about .Include and .Select, but if I do that, I need to change lots of code cause in my repository I return a Queryable and Service layer too.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T12:13:22+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 12:13 pm

    An indirect answer: I would not expose IQueryable in a service layer. For (at least) three reasons:

    • You must keep the context alive for when a navigation property is accessed.
    • The layers that use your service layer can profoundly influence the SQL emitted to the database. You want to be in control of that that in your service or repository.
    • Unit testing your service layer is very hard.

    So if you expose IEnumerables of objects that you need in your application you can offer objects that have exactly those navigation properties loaded that are needed in a specific scenario. E.g. a maintenance function for product entities (name etc.) would get bare products only (and no code would ever access ingredients). A function that composes products from ingredients would get its ingredients as well. Service/repository methods should have parameters to specify what you need.

    If you want 100% guarantee that lazy navigation properties are not going to be accessed you need to expose projected objects (or DTO’s) to your application.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In a base class I have this property: public virtual string Text { get
I have a class: public class User { public virtual int Id { get;
I have two classes: public class Parent { public virtual long? ID { get;
I have two classes public class News { public virtual int Id { get;
I have a collection class that inherits from List<T> public class TestCollection : List<Test>
I have my class X : public class ClassX { public virtual IList<ClassY> ListY
I have a class: class A { public: virtual void func() {…} virtual void
i have situation like this: class IData { virtual void get() = 0; virtual
my question is rather simple, if you have an pure virtual class (interface) but
I have an abstract class that has a virtual method. The method is virtual

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.