Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6015423
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T02:50:02+00:00 2026-05-23T02:50:02+00:00

I have a class WorkQueue , just take note about the DoNext() for now,

  • 0

I have a class WorkQueue, just take note about the DoNext() for now, the rest are mainly helpers. Basically, WorkQueue is just a Queue of WorkItems. DoNext() is responsible for “Starting a Pending WorkItem with a Free Background Worker”. Also note that it will set the WorkItem.Worker property.

public class WorkQueue<Tin, Tout> :
    INotifyCollectionChanged, IEnumerable<WorkItem<Tin, Tout>>
{
    public bool DoNext()
    {
        // check if any work left in queue
        WorkItem<Tin, Tout> item = GetWork();
        if (item != null)
        {
            // check if any free workers
            BackgroundWorker worker = GetWorker();
            Debug.WriteLine(
                "[WorkQueue.DoNext] Setting Worker to WorkItem: " + worker);
            item.Worker = worker;
            if (worker != null)
            {
                worker.RunWorkerAsync(item);
                return true;
            }
        }
        return false;
    }
    public void AddWork(WorkItem<Tin, Tout> item)
    {
        _queue.Add(item);
        RaiseCollectionChanged(
            new NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs(
                NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add, item));
    }

    public WorkItem<Tin, Tout> GetWork()
    {
        return (from i in _queue
                where i.Status == WorkStatus.Pending
                select i).FirstOrDefault();;
    }

    public BackgroundWorker GetWorker()
    {
        return (from worker in _workers
                where worker.IsBusy == false
                select worker).FirstOrDefault();
    }
}

The problem I am having is when I do something like below,

foreach (string filename in fileNames) {
    UploadQueue.AddWork(new WorkItem<string, UploadedImage>(filename));
    UploadQueue.DoNext();
}

Where UploadQueue is a WorkQueue<string, UploadedImage>. On the 1st (first only) DoNext(), the WorkItem.Worker is null. I know that because my Cancel button bound to WorkItem.CancelCommand is disabled. When debugging, I discovered the reason was because worker is null.

_cancelCommand = new RelayCommand(... () =>
{
    // Returns true if WorkItem is being processed with a worker that supports
    // cancellation or if the WorkItem is still Pending
    // False if otherwise, eg. already completed, cancelled etc
    if (Status == WorkStatus.Processing)
    {
        if (_worker != null && _worker.WorkerSupportsCancellation)
            return true;
    } else if (Status == WorkStatus.Pending) {
        return true;
    }
    return false;
});

The solution is to move the DoNext() out of the loop,

foreach (string filename in fileNames)
    UploadQueue.AddWork(new WorkItem<string, UploadedImage>(filename));
UploadQueue.DoNext();

but whats the problem with it inside, why is worker set to null? If its null, from the if clause, the BackgroundWorker should not start?

if (worker != null)
    worker.RunWorkerAsync(item);

Video Demonstrating the Problem

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T02:50:03+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 2:50 am
    public BackgroundWorker GetWorker()
    {
        return (from worker in _workers
                where worker.IsBusy == false
                select worker).FirstOrDefault();
    }
    

    if all of the workers are busy, this function will return null;

    foreach (string filename in fileNames)
        UploadQueue.AddWork(new WorkItem<string, UploadedImage>(filename));
        UploadQueue.DoNext();
    

    UploadQueue.DoNext() executed multiple times

    foreach (string filename in fileNames)
        UploadQueue.AddWork(new WorkItem<string, UploadedImage>(filename));
    UploadQueue.DoNext();
    

    UploadQueue.DoNext() executed once.

    Then it’s quite clear, if you execute UploadQueue.DoNext() multiple times in a short time period, there will be no worker which is not busy, so you get a null worker

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a QueueProcessor class that processes a work queue. I want to send
I have class called GroupSelect and made a collection List(Of GroupSelect)() . Now I
I have class called GroupSelect and made a collection List(Of GroupSelect)() . Now I
I have class method that returns a list of employees that I can iterate
I have: class MyClass extends MyClass2 implements Serializable { //... } In MyClass2 is
I have class A: public class ClassA<T> Class B derives from A: public class
I have class with internal property: internal virtual StateEnum EnrolmentState { get { ..getter
I have class with a member function that takes a default argument. struct Class
I have class Cab(models.Model): name = models.CharField( max_length=20 ) descr = models.CharField( max_length=2000 )
I have: class Car {..} class Other{ List<T> GetAll(){..} } I want to do:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.